<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Media Favorites</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.synapticdomination.com/2008/08/media-favorites/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.synapticdomination.com/2008/08/media-favorites/</link>
	<description>Ideas, Opinions, Discussions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 19:10:24 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.synapticdomination.com/2008/08/media-favorites/#comment-342</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 21:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synapticdomination.com/?p=208#comment-342</guid>
		<description>Available via US mass media, CNN reports (Aug 22):

&quot;U.S. and Iraqi negotiators have reached agreement on a proposal calling for a complete U.S. military withdrawal from Iraq by 2012...

...President Bush was briefed on the negotiations and then spoke by secure video conference with Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki. The spokesman said the two agreed that their negotiating teams would continue discussions.

...last date for the presence of U.S. troops in cities and towns will be June 30, 2009.&quot;

Don&#039;t you find it odd that European news media obtained this information for mass consumption before the American media?  Also, they state &quot;Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and al-Maliki was helpful in reaching the tentative agreement.&quot;  The tentative agreement spoke of on Aug 14th occurred before she was even in Iraq.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Available via US mass media, CNN reports (Aug 22):</p>
<p>&#8220;U.S. and Iraqi negotiators have reached agreement on a proposal calling for a complete U.S. military withdrawal from Iraq by 2012&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;President Bush was briefed on the negotiations and then spoke by secure video conference with Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki. The spokesman said the two agreed that their negotiating teams would continue discussions.</p>
<p>&#8230;last date for the presence of U.S. troops in cities and towns will be June 30, 2009.&#8221;</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t you find it odd that European news media obtained this information for mass consumption before the American media?  Also, they state &#8220;Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and al-Maliki was helpful in reaching the tentative agreement.&#8221;  The tentative agreement spoke of on Aug 14th occurred before she was even in Iraq.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.synapticdomination.com/2008/08/media-favorites/#comment-325</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 15:06:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synapticdomination.com/?p=208#comment-325</guid>
		<description>The following information provides additional information on media playing favorites in politics (proven true via snopes link below post).  Thanks for the email Chris:

House #1 A 20 room mansion (not including 8 bathrooms) heated by natural gas. Add on a pool (and a pool house) and a separate guest house, all heated by gas. In one month this residence consumes more energy than the average American household does in a year. The average bill for electricity and natural gas runs over $2400 per month. In natural gas alone, this property consumes more than 20 times the national average for an American home. This house is not situated in a Norther n or Midwestern &#039;snow belt&#039; area. It&#039;s in the South.

House #2 Designed by an architecture professor at a leading national university. This house incorporates every &#039;green&#039; feature current home construction can provide. The house is 4,000 square feet (4 bedrooms) and is nestled on a high prairie in the American southwest. A central closet in the house holds geothermal heat-pumps drawing ground water through pipes sunk 300 feet into the ground.

The water (usually 67 degrees F) heats the house in the winter and cools it in the summer. The system uses no fossil fuel s such as oil or natural gas and it consumes one-quarter electricity required for a conventional heating/cooling system. Rainwater from the roof is collected and funneled into a 25,000 gallon underground cistern. Wastewater from showers, sinks and toilets goes into underg round purifying tanks and then into the cistern. The collected water then irrigates the land surrounding the house. Surrounding flowers and shrubs native to the area enable the property to blend into the surrounding rural landscape.

HOUSE #1 is outside of Nashville , Tennessee ; it is the abode of the &#039;environmentalist &#039; Al Gore.

HOUSE #2 is on a ranch near Crawford , Texas ; it is the residence of the President of the United States , George W. Bush.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.snopes.com/politics/bush/house.asp&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Snopes Link&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The following information provides additional information on media playing favorites in politics (proven true via snopes link below post).  Thanks for the email Chris:</p>
<p>House #1 A 20 room mansion (not including 8 bathrooms) heated by natural gas. Add on a pool (and a pool house) and a separate guest house, all heated by gas. In one month this residence consumes more energy than the average American household does in a year. The average bill for electricity and natural gas runs over $2400 per month. In natural gas alone, this property consumes more than 20 times the national average for an American home. This house is not situated in a Norther n or Midwestern &#8217;snow belt&#8217; area. It&#8217;s in the South.</p>
<p>House #2 Designed by an architecture professor at a leading national university. This house incorporates every &#8216;green&#8217; feature current home construction can provide. The house is 4,000 square feet (4 bedrooms) and is nestled on a high prairie in the American southwest. A central closet in the house holds geothermal heat-pumps drawing ground water through pipes sunk 300 feet into the ground.</p>
<p>The water (usually 67 degrees F) heats the house in the winter and cools it in the summer. The system uses no fossil fuel s such as oil or natural gas and it consumes one-quarter electricity required for a conventional heating/cooling system. Rainwater from the roof is collected and funneled into a 25,000 gallon underground cistern. Wastewater from showers, sinks and toilets goes into underg round purifying tanks and then into the cistern. The collected water then irrigates the land surrounding the house. Surrounding flowers and shrubs native to the area enable the property to blend into the surrounding rural landscape.</p>
<p>HOUSE #1 is outside of Nashville , Tennessee ; it is the abode of the &#8216;environmentalist &#8216; Al Gore.</p>
<p>HOUSE #2 is on a ranch near Crawford , Texas ; it is the residence of the President of the United States , George W. Bush.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.snopes.com/politics/bush/house.asp" rel="nofollow">Snopes Link</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.synapticdomination.com/2008/08/media-favorites/#comment-321</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 19:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synapticdomination.com/?p=208#comment-321</guid>
		<description>Additional information from timesonline.co.uk (Aug 14):

&quot;American soldiers will withdraw from cities across Iraq next summer and all US combat troops will leave the country within three years, provided the violence remains low, under the terms of a draft agreement with the Iraqi Government.

...Nouri al-Maliki, the Prime Minister, Jalal Talabani, the President, and other Iraqi leaders must give their approval – something that could happen this month...

The “time horizon” for the exit of US troops would depend upon the ability of the Iraqi police and army to maintain security gains in Iraq after a surge of US forces in 2007 helped to push violence to its lowest levels in 4½ years.

We are talking about combat troops, maybe in 2010-11, there could be drawdowns...&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Additional information from timesonline.co.uk (Aug 14):</p>
<p>&#8220;American soldiers will withdraw from cities across Iraq next summer and all US combat troops will leave the country within three years, provided the violence remains low, under the terms of a draft agreement with the Iraqi Government.</p>
<p>&#8230;Nouri al-Maliki, the Prime Minister, Jalal Talabani, the President, and other Iraqi leaders must give their approval – something that could happen this month&#8230;</p>
<p>The “time horizon” for the exit of US troops would depend upon the ability of the Iraqi police and army to maintain security gains in Iraq after a surge of US forces in 2007 helped to push violence to its lowest levels in 4½ years.</p>
<p>We are talking about combat troops, maybe in 2010-11, there could be drawdowns&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.synapticdomination.com/2008/08/media-favorites/#comment-315</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 04:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synapticdomination.com/?p=208#comment-315</guid>
		<description>The media has gained such a foothold in American society since the advent of cable television.  People assume that with 24 hour news, we are getting an unfiltered, unbiased, and clear view at the &quot;news&quot; of the world.  However, they are all run by profit motive companies.  These companies are in charge of content and filters and viewpoints.  If the media isn&#039;t making money, then it doesn&#039;t get any notoriety.

Do you think the media giants who have invested so much time in destroying the image of the Republican Party and President Bush will provide any time to anything good at this point in time?  Highly doubtful.  Why try and alter the winds of change and waves of hate directed their way when Obama is the media darling of these same media giants?

What we see, hear, and read is skewed by marketing and political flunkies in the backrooms deciding how the news should be portrayed.  You referred to Vietnam.  Very similar situation that we are in now.  The enemy was extremely hard to determine and winning was never going to be a clear cut surrender.  The media failed to support the troops and they paid the price in the lack of respect from our nation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The media has gained such a foothold in American society since the advent of cable television.  People assume that with 24 hour news, we are getting an unfiltered, unbiased, and clear view at the &#8220;news&#8221; of the world.  However, they are all run by profit motive companies.  These companies are in charge of content and filters and viewpoints.  If the media isn&#8217;t making money, then it doesn&#8217;t get any notoriety.</p>
<p>Do you think the media giants who have invested so much time in destroying the image of the Republican Party and President Bush will provide any time to anything good at this point in time?  Highly doubtful.  Why try and alter the winds of change and waves of hate directed their way when Obama is the media darling of these same media giants?</p>
<p>What we see, hear, and read is skewed by marketing and political flunkies in the backrooms deciding how the news should be portrayed.  You referred to Vietnam.  Very similar situation that we are in now.  The enemy was extremely hard to determine and winning was never going to be a clear cut surrender.  The media failed to support the troops and they paid the price in the lack of respect from our nation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.synapticdomination.com/2008/08/media-favorites/#comment-314</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 04:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synapticdomination.com/?p=208#comment-314</guid>
		<description>It is very sad when we cannot believe what most of our media decides that we should hear. Or for that matter, our politicians who also talk with forked tongues.
  What happened to the pride that brought us through WW1 and WW2? 
Every country in the world has their eyes on the United States to see if we have the backbone and the backing of our citizens and politicians to finish the job that we have started. If we pull out too early, then the soldiers that have lost their lives or wounded in action would have all been done for nothing. 
Iran would just love to see the U.S. pull all of its forces out too early, this would make very easy pickings for them to take the whole country over. 
  I don&#039;t remember what the man&#039;s name was that said that this nation has turned into a bunch of whiners, but he was correct. One of John McCain&#039;s men I do believe.
  The citizens did not back our men during the Vietnam war. They treated some or most of the returning soldiers as if they had the plague. 
  I would speculate that a lot of this was brought on by bad press. Whatever it takes to make good ratings is what they will push. 
  Freedom of the press is one thing, but at least publish the truth, don&#039;t just go after the bad things and forget the good things that happen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is very sad when we cannot believe what most of our media decides that we should hear. Or for that matter, our politicians who also talk with forked tongues.<br />
  What happened to the pride that brought us through WW1 and WW2?<br />
Every country in the world has their eyes on the United States to see if we have the backbone and the backing of our citizens and politicians to finish the job that we have started. If we pull out too early, then the soldiers that have lost their lives or wounded in action would have all been done for nothing.<br />
Iran would just love to see the U.S. pull all of its forces out too early, this would make very easy pickings for them to take the whole country over.<br />
  I don&#8217;t remember what the man&#8217;s name was that said that this nation has turned into a bunch of whiners, but he was correct. One of John McCain&#8217;s men I do believe.<br />
  The citizens did not back our men during the Vietnam war. They treated some or most of the returning soldiers as if they had the plague.<br />
  I would speculate that a lot of this was brought on by bad press. Whatever it takes to make good ratings is what they will push.<br />
  Freedom of the press is one thing, but at least publish the truth, don&#8217;t just go after the bad things and forget the good things that happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.synapticdomination.com/2008/08/media-favorites/#comment-313</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 03:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synapticdomination.com/?p=208#comment-313</guid>
		<description>There are still conventional wars in our future I would guess, but the war on terror is far from that.  It is sad to think that we cannot truly win the war as past conflicts have been decided.  Our Presidential office has changed with the terrorists coming to the forefront of our nation&#039;s worries.  If we fail to recognize the threat and stay ready, we will experience the pain again.

I fear that complacency will set in as it&#039;s been almost 7 years now since 9/11 and the attitude of our nation is nowhere near the first few years past the attack.  We cannot assume everything will be ok just because nothing new has happened to us today.  Our next President will have an even tougher job than Bush has had because the unknown is far more scary than the known.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are still conventional wars in our future I would guess, but the war on terror is far from that.  It is sad to think that we cannot truly win the war as past conflicts have been decided.  Our Presidential office has changed with the terrorists coming to the forefront of our nation&#8217;s worries.  If we fail to recognize the threat and stay ready, we will experience the pain again.</p>
<p>I fear that complacency will set in as it&#8217;s been almost 7 years now since 9/11 and the attitude of our nation is nowhere near the first few years past the attack.  We cannot assume everything will be ok just because nothing new has happened to us today.  Our next President will have an even tougher job than Bush has had because the unknown is far more scary than the known.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ann</title>
		<link>http://www.synapticdomination.com/2008/08/media-favorites/#comment-312</link>
		<dc:creator>Ann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 03:17:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synapticdomination.com/?p=208#comment-312</guid>
		<description>The truth in this article has made me very sad.  We can never win the war on terrorism.  We can not recognize the enemy.  They live among us as our friends. We use to win our battles with honor, now we cannot even say we won.  Just prevented here and there major killings and murder. I would not want the President&#039;s job.  He will never be able to lead us to victory. And I think the President to be knows that.  So they will do their best to choose the way best to satisfy our country&#039;s questions and protect us the best they can. Our prayers need to be in earnest for our protectors and our countrymen and women. Our future is in God&#039;s hands now whether people accept it or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The truth in this article has made me very sad.  We can never win the war on terrorism.  We can not recognize the enemy.  They live among us as our friends. We use to win our battles with honor, now we cannot even say we won.  Just prevented here and there major killings and murder. I would not want the President&#8217;s job.  He will never be able to lead us to victory. And I think the President to be knows that.  So they will do their best to choose the way best to satisfy our country&#8217;s questions and protect us the best they can. Our prayers need to be in earnest for our protectors and our countrymen and women. Our future is in God&#8217;s hands now whether people accept it or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

