<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stimulus Effect</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.synapticdomination.com/2008/08/stimulus-effect/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.synapticdomination.com/2008/08/stimulus-effect/</link>
	<description>Ideas, Opinions, Discussions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 19:10:24 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.synapticdomination.com/2008/08/stimulus-effect/#comment-351</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 16:03:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synapticdomination.com/?p=207#comment-351</guid>
		<description>Who do we believe?  Why have the numbers changed so drastically in 20 days?  The government has long &quot;revised&quot; GDP numbers through the years and when things are bad, they always revise them upwards.  Basically what happened is the money the government gave to us, we spent.  Nothing has been saved to increase GDP for the long run.  The article further states this fact with:

&quot;We got a decent boost from the stimulus, which hit the economy at a time when we really needed it,&quot; said Wachovia senior economist Mark Vitner. &quot;It will have less of an impact going forward, though and we may even have a payback in the fourth quarter.&quot;

I am very skeptical of their revised numbers.  Remember, we are at the height of a Presidential campaign with the election less than 90 days away and the economy has become priority number 1 in voter&#039;s minds.  We all like to hear good news, but I just don&#039;t put much faith in the latest government sponsored economic numbers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who do we believe?  Why have the numbers changed so drastically in 20 days?  The government has long &#8220;revised&#8221; GDP numbers through the years and when things are bad, they always revise them upwards.  Basically what happened is the money the government gave to us, we spent.  Nothing has been saved to increase GDP for the long run.  The article further states this fact with:</p>
<p>&#8220;We got a decent boost from the stimulus, which hit the economy at a time when we really needed it,&#8221; said Wachovia senior economist Mark Vitner. &#8220;It will have less of an impact going forward, though and we may even have a payback in the fourth quarter.&#8221;</p>
<p>I am very skeptical of their revised numbers.  Remember, we are at the height of a Presidential campaign with the election less than 90 days away and the economy has become priority number 1 in voter&#8217;s minds.  We all like to hear good news, but I just don&#8217;t put much faith in the latest government sponsored economic numbers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.synapticdomination.com/2008/08/stimulus-effect/#comment-350</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 15:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synapticdomination.com/?p=207#comment-350</guid>
		<description>On August 28th, the government released &quot;updated&quot; information regarding the 2nd quarter&#039;s GDP.  Newly minted &quot;correct&quot; information shows the following (from CNN):

&quot;GDP, the broadest measure of the nation&#039;s economic activity, stood at an annual rate of 3.3% in the quarter, adjusted for inflation, the Commerce Department said.

Economic growth between 2.5% and 3.5% is typically viewed as the norm for a healthy economy.

The revised result surpassed last month&#039;s initial estimate of 1.9%. It also surprised economists surveyed by Briefing.com who expected a revision to 2.7%.

Personal spending helped add 1.2% to the second-quarter preliminary GDP reading released Thursday, up from the advanced reading of 1% for the quarter and just 0.6% in the first quarter.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On August 28th, the government released &#8220;updated&#8221; information regarding the 2nd quarter&#8217;s GDP.  Newly minted &#8220;correct&#8221; information shows the following (from CNN):</p>
<p>&#8220;GDP, the broadest measure of the nation&#8217;s economic activity, stood at an annual rate of 3.3% in the quarter, adjusted for inflation, the Commerce Department said.</p>
<p>Economic growth between 2.5% and 3.5% is typically viewed as the norm for a healthy economy.</p>
<p>The revised result surpassed last month&#8217;s initial estimate of 1.9%. It also surprised economists surveyed by Briefing.com who expected a revision to 2.7%.</p>
<p>Personal spending helped add 1.2% to the second-quarter preliminary GDP reading released Thursday, up from the advanced reading of 1% for the quarter and just 0.6% in the first quarter.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.synapticdomination.com/2008/08/stimulus-effect/#comment-306</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 17:49:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synapticdomination.com/?p=207#comment-306</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the positive feedback!  Yes, we have learned to become credit card &quot;addicts&quot; but I believe that for a lot of Americans, it&#039;s a result of the economic conditions they live under.  People cannot afford to drive to their work, feed the family, and pay their fixed costs of living anymore with the current wages being eaten away.  The others are a byproduct of the American environment that has been pushed down our throats in the last generation.  Live well and be regarded as a success or be bypassed by the winners of society.

However, everyone cannot be a &quot;winner&quot; in the manner our environment has taught us.  We are all losers in the sense of debt.  Eventually, there will be a breaking point.  It will either come at the expense of businesses failing or the government stepping in to prop up the failing economy.  As you have seen, we are seeing both happen.  It has to be one or the other, doing both only softens the immediate pain, but the long term effect will still be waiting for us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the positive feedback!  Yes, we have learned to become credit card &#8220;addicts&#8221; but I believe that for a lot of Americans, it&#8217;s a result of the economic conditions they live under.  People cannot afford to drive to their work, feed the family, and pay their fixed costs of living anymore with the current wages being eaten away.  The others are a byproduct of the American environment that has been pushed down our throats in the last generation.  Live well and be regarded as a success or be bypassed by the winners of society.</p>
<p>However, everyone cannot be a &#8220;winner&#8221; in the manner our environment has taught us.  We are all losers in the sense of debt.  Eventually, there will be a breaking point.  It will either come at the expense of businesses failing or the government stepping in to prop up the failing economy.  As you have seen, we are seeing both happen.  It has to be one or the other, doing both only softens the immediate pain, but the long term effect will still be waiting for us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ann</title>
		<link>http://www.synapticdomination.com/2008/08/stimulus-effect/#comment-304</link>
		<dc:creator>Ann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 14:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synapticdomination.com/?p=207#comment-304</guid>
		<description>Yea!!! Great article!!!  Some very interesting ways to help the economy, but if a debt would be forgiven, the government would almost have to put stipulations on the forgiven debt. This would make the credit card companies even more upset.  But, if you didn&#039;t make some rules to go along with the forgiven debt, the people would just abuse the cards all over again.  And it wouldn&#039;t even be a week probably.  I think people have become credit card dependants.  They need help with this problem just like any other dependency need.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea!!! Great article!!!  Some very interesting ways to help the economy, but if a debt would be forgiven, the government would almost have to put stipulations on the forgiven debt. This would make the credit card companies even more upset.  But, if you didn&#8217;t make some rules to go along with the forgiven debt, the people would just abuse the cards all over again.  And it wouldn&#8217;t even be a week probably.  I think people have become credit card dependants.  They need help with this problem just like any other dependency need.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

