<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Synaptic Domination &#187; Constitution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.synapticdomination.com/tag/constitution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.synapticdomination.com</link>
	<description>Ideas, Opinions, Discussions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 03:41:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Ears for Obama</title>
		<link>http://www.synapticdomination.com/2009/03/ears-for-obama/</link>
		<comments>http://www.synapticdomination.com/2009/03/ears-for-obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 02:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political Beefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stimulus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vote]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synapticdomination.com/?p=340</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ No, I’m not talking about Obama’s protuberances from each side of his head… I’m talking about the earmarks he so blatantly campaigned against, but signed into law the first chance he was given. The federal government, in need of a spending bill to keep the doors open for business, sent through a $400 plus [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>No, I’m not talking about Obama’s protuberances from each side of his head… I’m talking about the earmarks he so blatantly campaigned against, but signed into law the first chance he was given.<span> </span>The federal government, in need of a spending bill to keep the doors open for business, sent through a $400 plus bill laced with greedy earmarks by the very politicians clamoring for stimulus money for their states to survive.<span> </span>Earmarks are essentially line items that cannot pass on their own and appropriate federal money for personal political agendas.<span> </span>They are attached to larger bills that are seemingly unstoppable so that they slide through under the “watchful” eyes of other politicians.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>During the Obama campaign to become President, he consistently spoke about how he wanted serious earmark reform and how he was going to limit the total earmark spending to that of 1994 levels.<span> </span>His opponent, John McCain, vowed to cut earmarks off completely.<span> </span>They are frivolous wastes of money.<span> </span>If they cannot pass on their own, they should not be force-fed to the American public through the blatant misuse of political power and agenda pushing.<span> </span>In 1994, about $7.8 billion was spent on earmarks… I guess that promise is out the window.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>The $400 billion bill contains nearly 9,000 earmark line items that account for almost $8 billion of American taxpayer funds.<span> </span>These are the line items that have been identified by various groups and are public knowledge.<span> </span>Obama himself has acknowledged the existence of these non-essential additions of expenses… his excuse is that he did not have time to examine and prioritize the current bill.<span> </span>The timing of the bill was of the utmost importance to keep the doors of the government open…<span> </span>Do you care if the government’s doors are open?<span> </span>Aren’t they closed for the majority of the year anyway while the politicians are off vacationing on taxpayer dollars or off throwing parties sponsored by the ultra-rich lobbyist parties?</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>How did this bill come about?<span> </span>How come the President, who is the figurehead of the Democratic Party, can’t convince his own Party to do away with unworthy earmarks throwing tax dollars away?<span> </span>The Democrats are the ones in power in both the House and Senate… and they have been since 2006.<span> </span>I suppose the Republicans are at fault or the Bush administration had something to do with the Democrats flaunting their newfound power and pushing their precious agenda forward at the expense of an already suffering nation.<span> </span>$8 billion more down the drain… in a time when unemployment is on the rise and the stock market is at 12 year lows.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>I cannot understand how people can turn a blind eye to what is going on now that the Democratic Party has ultimate control.<span> </span>Obama has turned his back on his campaign promises in an effort to satisfy his true liberal political roots.<span> </span>He is cashing in the American dream to satisfy the debts he owes… the debts he created in becoming President.<span> </span>Oh, you may be one of the naïve people who believe Obama won on his own merits and political rhetoric… hardly.<span> </span>He is a figurehead pushed upon us by a vast legion of liberal elitists.<span> </span>He’s a transparent blowhard politician through and through and they always answer to someone.<span> </span>I’m not a tin foil hat wearer, but where money and power exist, there are people conspiring to gather more of each at all costs.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>Obama, our political savior has become nothing more than a rubber stamp for his liberal friends and their policies… well, his policies.<span> </span>At just more than 50 days, Obama’s approval rating has already begun to slip.<span> </span>His own Party is becoming antsy in how he is handling the economic crisis.<span> </span>The $800 billion stimulus bill passed, but not in the manner that made Obama look “Presidential.”</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>There is nothing that can be done now, Obama will sign his name onto this new bill and we will see another $8 billion burn while many of us continue to lose our jobs, our retirements, and our house that is/was our family’s home.<span> </span>How many politicians do you know who have lost their house… their car… their retirement… anything for that matter?<span> </span>Not one.<span> </span>The Washington political families are safe forever, they have padded their wallets from raping the American citizens for decades… they have only the blackmailing lobbyists to worry about along with their own indecency.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>It’s another sad day for the American citizen whether you’re an Obama supporter or not.<span> </span>You are losing your rights, your future, and your Constitution just as I am.<span> </span>If the first 50 days are a representation of what we’ll get for the next 1,400 while Obama is President, there may not be 50 states in our Union.<span> </span>Some states do have sense and we all have a Constitutional right to defend what this country stands for.<span> </span>People forget that states voted to become a part of the Union, the smart ones may remember that we can vote ourselves out of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.synapticdomination.com/2009/03/ears-for-obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Political Aspirations</title>
		<link>http://www.synapticdomination.com/2009/03/political-aspirations/</link>
		<comments>http://www.synapticdomination.com/2009/03/political-aspirations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 04:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political Beefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Selfish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Statistic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vote]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synapticdomination.com/?p=337</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Some people grow up wanting to be doctors, others want to be firefighters, and even some hope to join the military to serve our country. These are but a few of the job fields our young people believe they want to join when they grow up. When we are young, we focus on the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>Some people grow up wanting to be doctors, others want to be firefighters, and even some hope to join the military to serve our country.<span> </span>These are but a few of the job fields our young people believe they want to join when they grow up.<span> </span>When we are young, we focus on the jobs that help or protect people.<span> </span>We are a bit more emotional and innocent at that stage in our life.<span> </span>We haven’t been subjected to the grisly and grimy world that tends to blur our morals and ethics into a bludgeoned wreck of what used to be innocence.<span> </span>In essence, we haven’t become jaded at this stage of life.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>At some point in time, there are those who actually aspire to become politicians.<span> </span>Yes, even young people desire to become politicians because they are the people in power.<span> </span>Politicians can create immediate impact and change in the lives of our citizens very quickly.<span> </span>However, the young people looking to hold these offices are often looking at it with an innocent point of view that allows them to see the inherent power as something they can use for the good of everyone.<span> </span>They know they can protect and help those in need and help foster a better land.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>Somewhere along the line, between the young innocent eyes and the jaded adult eyes, things change.<span> </span>No longer are the political offices used to protect and serve the people, they are there to promote self indulgence, greed, power, money, and ego among many other selfish wants.<span> </span>On the way to achieving these political offices, our young politicians will have their innocence downright ripped from their heart and soul as they play the politics game.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>There is no “honest” way to win a race these days.<span> </span>The vast amounts of money and lobbyists behind the major political parties cannot allow a level playing field.<span> </span>Even at the local level, the people with the greatest chance to attain office are those who have lived with the local in crowd of those in local power.<span> </span>The people with strong ties to the banks in town, the business leaders who run the chamber of commerce, the business owners who play the silent partners in the major dealings of the town…<span> </span>Even at the very basic local level, there is still a great amount of power mongering and ego driving.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>Political aspirations usually start out as innocent as wanting to become a fireman, but in our current lifetime, nobody can make it through the process without become jaded, changed, and run by those who put them into power.<span> </span>In my mind, our politicians are all run by someone.<span> </span>There is always a man behind the curtain.<span> </span>That man may be a political party, groups with money beyond belief, and even people using blackmail.<span> </span>There is always someone to answer to once political office is achieved.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>This is why we do not see any average citizen take any important office.<span> </span>All we are treated to are lifelong lawyers, political leeches, and political office families that pass the torch down from generation to generation as if it’s a rite of passage.<span> </span>The problem with this process is that these people have long forgotten what common sense is.<span> </span>They continually over think everything.<span> </span>They pour over statistics and polls of their supporting demographics in an effort to maintain votes for the next election.<span> </span>They fail to realize what is best for the country may not be the best for their own individual political aspirations.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>Making the right decision is hard enough without trying to make everything politically correct or ok by your party’s so called standards.<span> </span>The simple test should be is it fair, and does it promote the growth of the United States while staying true to the Constitution.<span> </span>Our politicians have created such horrendous examples of laws that nobody can figure them out… just check out our tax laws.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>We need that nature of the young to return to our lives.<span> </span>We need innocence to return.<span> </span>We need lifelong politicians out of our lives and we need real Americans in our offices to lead us.<span> </span>Who better to lead than the average citizen?<span> </span>The elite classes who run our country have been out of touch with America for too long.<span> </span>They need the boot and normalcy deserves a return to our lives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.synapticdomination.com/2009/03/political-aspirations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>First Month Jitters</title>
		<link>http://www.synapticdomination.com/2009/02/first-month-jitters/</link>
		<comments>http://www.synapticdomination.com/2009/02/first-month-jitters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 01:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political Beefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Failure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stimulus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wealth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synapticdomination.com/?p=332</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ This week completed the first official month of Barack Obama’s Presidency. Obama was riding a sentimental wave of enthusiasm into office with millions of supporters welcoming him into the White House as he swore upon the Bible to uphold the Constitution of the United States. After all the campaign promises were made with the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>This week completed the first official month of Barack Obama’s Presidency.<span> </span>Obama was riding a sentimental wave of enthusiasm into office with millions of supporters welcoming him into the White House as he swore upon the Bible to uphold the Constitution of the United States.<span> </span>After all the campaign promises were made with the assumption that he could easily direct the country’s lawmakers, the Democratic and Independent Obama voters were expecting nothing more than a smashing success which no political party has ever witnessed.<span> </span>Well, it appears there are a few bumps along the expected golden brick road to political “fairytaledom.”</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>Even with an overwhelming majority in both the House and Senate, Obama has faced some difficult experiences in his first month when trying to push through his ideology and policy decisions.<span> </span>Yes, the majority of what he wants has come to pass, but not without spending a considerable amount of his theoretical and generally worthless, political capital.<span> </span>There have been disastrous cabinet appointee failures and there have been unfavorable responses to some of his proposed stimulus bill policies among many other minor disturbances.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>I distinctly remember the night Obama invoked his awe inspiring acceptance speech on the night of our general election.<span> </span>I also distinctly remember him telling the millions of Americans who did not vote for him how he was going to be their President too.<span> </span>He told us that he was going to walk down the aisle of bi-partisanship.<span> </span>He told us he was going to bring change to Washington.<span> </span>He told us he was going to work for the people to make our nation what it once was.<span> </span>Little more than 30 days into his Presidency, is he keeping his promises he made that night?<span> </span>Is he keeping the promises he made on the campaign trail?</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>Well, number one, Obama brought no change to Washington as he did nothing more than appoint Washington insiders to every post he has been given a chance to fill.<span> </span>He has mined the standby Democratic powers that be to the fullest.<span> </span>Where is the new blood?<span> </span>Where is the “Yes we can” ideology?<span> </span>Why do we have to sit back and watch the same politicians who have been running our government for generations continue their abuse of power over the American citizen?<span> </span>Why… when the single most important aspect of Obama’s campaign was change?</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>If I had voted for Obama, I would be sitting pretty uncomfortable right now because the man I would have voted for is not the man sitting in the Oval Office at this point in time.<span> </span>Sure, he has another 47 months to change how we perceive him, but hey, there is something to first impressions…<span> </span>I’ve got some numbers from the latest polls that show all is not well with the savior of the free world’s first month.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>In only 30 days, Obama’s approval rating has dropped by nearly 10 percentage points.<span> </span>Two out of three Americans currently approve of how Obama is doing.<span> </span>That is still an extremely high number, but a nine percent drop in one month should be extremely worrisome for Obama supporters.<span> </span>Where did the drop come from?<span> </span>There are three segments polled, Democrats, Independents, and Republicans.<span> </span>Of course the Republican vote dropped the most from 50 percent to a drastically reduced 31 percent.<span> </span>Hey, even half of the Republican crowd gave Obama the benefit of the doubt… only to be shown his true colors in less than one month how the liberal Obama would govern our country.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>The other two segments dropped as follows:<span> </span>Independents (the ones who actually voted Obama into office) dropped to 61 from 67 percent.<span> </span>Democrats basically held steadfast to their banker, err, I mean President with 92 percent, slightly down from 96 percent.<span> </span>If I were a Democrat, I would be pretty happy with what has transpired during the first month because by selling my vote, I now have more federal money coming my way that I haven’t worked for at the expense of those who do.<span> </span>I’ve also got more tax rebates coming my way that I don’t deserve because I didn’t pay anything in taxes during the year.<span> </span>It’s a great system at this juncture for a Democrat and the Democratic voting bloc.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>First month jitters or the real Obama?<span> </span>Which one is it?<span> </span>My vote is that it’s the real Obama.<span> </span>The one with puppet strings tied to massive bank accounts of unknown campaign contributors.<span> </span>He is the one with ultra liberal policies who lied to the American public about his stance regarding bi-partisanship.<span> </span>As my bank account, 401k, home value, and confidence shrinks, there are others in the country receiving the benefits of selling their vote by sharing the shrinking wealth of those who work and earn their living.<span> </span>The first month jitters are costing millions of Americans jobs, money, and their future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.synapticdomination.com/2009/02/first-month-jitters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tax Season</title>
		<link>http://www.synapticdomination.com/2009/02/tax-season/</link>
		<comments>http://www.synapticdomination.com/2009/02/tax-season/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 03:12:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Everyday Nonsense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Incentive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wealth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synapticdomination.com/?p=329</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Are you ready for April 15th? Tax season has once again come around the corner and along with it, lots of gripes and groans. Nobody thinks the current system is fair except for the people who get more back in tax credit than they pay in. It’s their day to bask in the sun [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>Are you ready for April 15<sup>th</sup>?<span> </span>Tax season has once again come around the corner and along with it, lots of gripes and groans.<span> </span>Nobody thinks the current system is fair except for the people who get more back in tax credit than they pay in.<span> </span>It’s their day to bask in the sun when they receive that government rebate check for basically providing nothing to the economic progress of our country.<span> </span>For those of us who make the financial wheels turn, we face a much less exciting day.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>All kinds of arguments are around us regarding what is fair and what isn’t when we talk about taxes.<span> </span>We hear terms such as progressive, regressive, inclusive, exclusive, and even sometimes we hear about a thing called The Fair Tax.<span> </span>Assuming we need to pay for our government to run, we need to pay some form of taxation so that we can have a military to protect our borders.<span> </span>We also need a governing body in place to protect our Constitution and our rights as citizens.<span> </span>The rest of the governing can be done at the state level in my opinion.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>I’m not going to talk about that though… Today I ran across a discussion on our local major newspaper’s website involving The Fair Tax… or flat tax or even national sales tax as some people like to call it whether that’s correct or not.<span> </span>I’ve written an article or two about that particular tax plan and I am a strong supporter of it.<span> </span>I’m not going to go into the details of the plan again, but you can read about it online and even read my past articles.<span> </span>What I want to talk about is a particular comment made by someone in the discussion I read today.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>Person X states, “The only fair tax is a steeply progressive income tax.<span> </span>It puts the tax burden on those who can afford it.”<span> </span>This of course was in response to someone supporting The Fair Tax, but person X has never read or understands the components of the proposed plan/bill.<span> </span>What is mind numbing to me is the simple statement made above.<span> </span>A “steeply progressive” income tax is absolute communism… purely blatant Marxism to the dotted i and crossed t.<span> </span>As for the “burden” of taxes, who are you to decide?<span> </span>Is your vote worth more than another American citizen?<span> </span>Is your dollar worth more than your neighbor’s?</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>Sure, wealthy people can theoretically “afford” to pay more taxes, but should they be required to pay for everyone’s way just because they can withstand such a burden?<span> </span>Oh, it’s the greater good argument, I get that.<span> </span>That’s socialism and communism wrapped up in a nice ideology.<span> </span>Let me just say that I work for my wealth and I pay my taxes to support many things I am ardently opposed to.<span> </span>My tax dollars are now supporting abortions thanks to Mr. Savior President Barack Obama.<span> </span>My tax dollars are now supporting more welfare families that have no ambition to work than ever before.<span> </span>My tax dollars support millions of immigrants who have no inclination to become citizens but yet still utilize our healthcare, our police protection, and our public services… all paid for by tax dollars.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>In the end, the wealthy and those who can withstand the “burden” of taxes will wise up and stop supporting the leeches of our society… fair for the goose right?<span> </span>Why would I choose to work and break my back to simply carry those “unfortunate” individuals who have less wealth?<span> </span>If you have the ability to work and aren’t disabled, you should be forced to work a 40 hour week just like everyone else BEFORE you receive a penny of taxpayer funded support.<span> </span>Helping the lazy in our society has put us in the position we are in.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>If I am required to help more and more people and policies that I do not support, guess what, I’m going to stop working.<span> </span>I’m going to stop supporting the dregs of our society.<span> </span>Eventually, more and more people will do the same.<span> </span>The wealthy and even middle class will leave the country… maybe not physically, but their money will.<span> </span>Jobs will leave the country because taxes will be too high within our borders.<span> </span>Nobody will work because the entire system is built upon reverse incentives.<span> </span>Work hard, pay for more lazy people to stay home.<span> </span>Great, that’s fair…</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>The tax system is nothing more than a vote buyoff program.<span> </span>The so-called needy, poor, or non-wealthy are nothing more than pawns in the games of those in power.<span> </span>This group of society gladly trades their rights for dollars in their pocket.<span> </span>Promise me a check and you can have my right and my vote.<span> </span>Thank you Mr. Obama… where’s my food stamps and tax rebate check?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.synapticdomination.com/2009/02/tax-season/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Day Of Change</title>
		<link>http://www.synapticdomination.com/2009/01/day-of-change/</link>
		<comments>http://www.synapticdomination.com/2009/01/day-of-change/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 01:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political Beefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kennedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synapticdomination.com/?p=321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ The day has come that Barack Obama will officially become the President of the United States. I am so unbelievably excited that I can hardly put into words how much this day excites me. No I’m not excited about the fact that he is becoming our nation’s leader and focal point of the free [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>The day has come that Barack Obama will officially become the President of the United States.<span> </span>I am so unbelievably excited that I can hardly put into words how much this day excites me.<span> </span>No I’m not excited about the fact that he is becoming our nation’s leader and focal point of the free world, but for many other reasons.<span> </span>This new day will bring upon us a day of closure.<span> </span>Again, no I’m not talking about the closure of the Bush administration, but for something altogether different.<span> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">If you have read more than a paragraph of any of my nearly 200 articles to this date, you know full well that Obama is not my favorite politician (He ranks in the same category as Nancy Pelosi, Ted Kennedy, and let’s throw someone of the same character in here, the ever brilliant political mind, Lindsay Lohan.)<span> </span>So if Obama is not my political savior and governmental messiah, why am I so excited about the day he takes the oath of office?</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Number one, I will NEVER have to hear another report by the so-called respectable news outlets about what dress Michelle Obama is going to wear to the inauguration.<span> </span>My ears have nearly bled from such innate conversation about nothing.<span> </span>As these reports wore on, I felt as if I were the one sitting in Guantanamo Bay being subjected to water boarding.<span> </span>Seriously, do we care?<span> </span>Is her dress going to hire two million people and replace the nearly 10 trillion dollars the stock market lost last year?<span> </span>Get over it, it’s just a dress.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Number two, I will NEVER have to hear another report about how there has never been a black President in our country (although Obama is only half black…).<span> </span>I could care less about the color of this man’s skin.<span> </span>Racism is alive and well in this country and for those who think this is the nail in racism’s coffin, continue living in your dream world and send me a check on behalf of your consummate stupidity.<span> </span>We all would like racism to be a dead and gone civil issue, but we must face the fact that it still exists.<span> </span>Sweeping an issue under the rug does not mean it’s cured.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Number three, Obama will now be given the chance to put his so-called money where his mouth is.<span> </span>I can run my mouth as well as Obama can, but he has now been given the position to where he can either come through on his promises or fail like all the other politicians.<span> </span>Yes, all the previous politicians have failed to achieve their campaign promises simply because they cannot change everything in such a short time.<span> </span>There is too much money and too much power on both sides of the aisle to allow the sweeping governmental change that Obama has promised.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">There are many other issues that I am sick of hearing about and I’m sure will still garner air time over the next few months and even years, but the time has come for Obama to show what he is made of.<span> </span>Is he a paper politician led by the vast wallets that helped get him elected?<span> </span>Is he deserving of the accolades he has received and the comparisons to MLK, JFK, and even Abraham Lincoln?<span> </span>Will his first term be his last?<span> </span>How will Obama deal with the enemies of our country abroad?<span> </span>Does he have what it truly takes to defend our Constitution or will he shred it like his policies and voting record portends?</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Our mainstream media will be riding the coattails of Obama for quite a while so we won’t get a true feel for his administration for quite some time.<span> </span>But, I figure about two years into his Presidency, our nation will know whether we elected a true leader or just another Jimmy Carter.<span> </span>While I don’t agree with Obama’s policies, I do hope that he and his administration achieve what is best for our country.<span> </span>Policy and politics aside, I’m an American citizen and we need good to come of this.<span> </span>I can only hope that America is a stronger nation because of the next four years and not a weaker one.<span> </span>So, let’s get on with this show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.synapticdomination.com/2009/01/day-of-change/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Many Patriots</title>
		<link>http://www.synapticdomination.com/2009/01/how-many-patriots/</link>
		<comments>http://www.synapticdomination.com/2009/01/how-many-patriots/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 00:22:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Everyday Nonsense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bailout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Selfish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wealth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synapticdomination.com/?p=317</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ While enjoying a night with our family recently, we engaged into a conversation relating to the existence of true patriots within the borders of our country. The debate filtered down to this topic after initially talking about the current dire state of our economy. If our country continues down the path into a modern [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>While enjoying a night with our family recently, we engaged into a conversation relating to the existence of true patriots within the borders of our country.<span> </span>The debate filtered down to this topic after initially talking about the current dire state of our economy.<span> </span>If our country continues down the path into a modern day depression, not just a deep recession, and our financial security evaporates along with the property rights of many Americans, there will come a time when our government will step in and try to “correct” the impending destruction of life as we know it.<span> </span>We have already seen the government take steps designed to slow the recession and these steps are well over the line of the basis of our free market philosophy.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>Our government has taken ownership stakes in many of our private financial institutions in an effort to shore up the consumer’s confidences in their existence.<span> </span>Our government has purchased failing home mortgages in an effort to shore up our decaying housing markets.<span> </span>Our government has rewritten what several of the free markets can and cannot do in an effort to stabilize the citizen’s faith in our economy.<span> </span>These are simple business deals in which the government has entered into in an effort to stop the declining economic situation.<span> </span>What about our Constitutional rights?<span> </span>Our modern government has changed from a government for the people and protector of our rights, to a government bent on disseminating rights to the people as it sees fit.<span> </span>Is that what our forefathers had in mind?<span> </span>Have you ever read our Constitution and Bill of Rights?</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>As our economy teeters on the brink of entering into a modern depression, our government has become antsy about what to do.<span> </span>They have used the current situation to extend their reach into the private markets and their next step is into our private lives.<span> </span>If we allow our Constitution to be shredded in the name of economic prosperity, what kind of patriots are we?<span> </span>When did a dollar in our pocket mean more to us than our freedom?</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>I know many people who would gladly trade a percentage of their freedoms for the government blessing of financial security.<span> </span>A dollar today and food on the table is worth more than living in a free society our forefathers gave their lives to secure.<span> </span>Personally, I would rather be poor and free than “rich” and live as a slave to the government.<span> </span>Our country is approaching a crossroads where our nation’s true patriots need to show up and be accounted for.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>We have all heard of the massive amounts of bailout money needed to prop up our current corporations in trouble.<span> </span>We have heard about the trillion dollar deficits coming in the next few years our President Elect has stated is necessary to push our country out of this deepening recession.<span> </span>Where is the money going to come from?<span> </span>Doesn’t it need to be paid back at some point in time?<span> </span>Who exactly is going to be footing this bill?</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>Let me give you one guess, and I’m sure you’re a pretty smart person.<span> </span>The American citizen is going to foot the bill.<span> </span>The payments can come in a variety of forms.<span> </span>Primarily, taxes are the form of repayment.<span> </span>On the other hand, if taxes aren’t enough to pay for the “fixes,” then the treasury must print money or write off the debt.<span> </span>When was the last time an American taxpayer had his taxes written off?<span> </span>Exactly… never.<span> </span>Printing money is a hidden tax upon our society.<span> </span>It will drive the value of our currency down and then we all pay the price of a weakened dollar.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>Has our country reached a place in our history where we will gladly trade our rights as citizens to our government in a plea for financial help?<span> </span>Will we overcome the desires to have financial wealth over the desires of true freedom?<span> </span>The cracks in our Constitutional rights and freedoms are already there and are growing.<span> </span>It is up to us to stop them from widening and destroying the basic foundation of our country.<span> </span>We need our patriots now more than ever. <span> </span>If we fail, our country could be destroyed by our own hands and not by some invading enemy.<span> </span>Are you a patriot or a freedom trader (or traitor)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.synapticdomination.com/2009/01/how-many-patriots/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Change Is The Same</title>
		<link>http://www.synapticdomination.com/2008/11/change-is-the-same/</link>
		<comments>http://www.synapticdomination.com/2008/11/change-is-the-same/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 16:32:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political Beefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kennedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synapticdomination.com/?p=296</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ How many times did you hear the war cry of the Obama campaign, “Change we can believe in?” How many times did you hear the chant, “Yes we can” throughout the election process? I heard it enough times that I actually began believing that President Elect Barack Obama was truly going to affiliate himself [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>How many times did you hear the war cry of the Obama campaign, “Change we can believe in?”<span> </span>How many times did you hear the chant, “Yes we can” throughout the election process?<span> </span>I heard it enough times that I actually began believing that President Elect Barack Obama was truly going to affiliate himself with a set of confidants and cabinet members who were not lifelong Washington D.C. insiders and political sycophants.<span> </span>I thought how can a man who has made so many promises to so many people possibly renege on his entire platform’s stance.<span> </span>I thought how can a man who has promised so much change and routinely invoked emotion by quoting Martin Luther King, John F. Kennedy, and a multitude of other great American leaders, not follow through with his own agenda?<span> </span>I was actually beginning to believe… until he started naming his cabinet choices.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>While I was always highly skeptical of Obama and his Liberal Agenda, I thought maybe, just maybe, he would be true to his word and bring new life and new blood to our government.<span> </span>I have never agreed with any portion of his Liberal Agenda, but I do subscribe to the necessary changes required in our governmental process.<span> </span>Even though his policies are against my beliefs, I thought maybe by bringing in some “change,” we would all benefit from it because the tried and true partisan politics we have experienced for generations would have to evolve and deal with the new regime for at least the next four years.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>Skepticism is usually based upon seeds of truth and my skeptical nature was confirmed not long after the final vote was cast in the election.<span> </span>Obama has begun the monumental task of putting together his cabinet while also “trying” to satisfy his campaign promises.<span> </span>As it turns out, campaign promises made by Obama are just as easy to break as any other politician seeking office.<span> </span>Did any of us truly think anything different?<span> </span>Sure, we were all overwhelmed by the momentous victory Obama achieved and all of the important social ramifications it presented, but we, people who voted for him and against, were told he would bring about “Change we can believe in.”</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>Where has this “change” gone?<span> </span>What change are we seeing when every single name he has considered and chosen been a political insider from previous regimes?<span> </span>What kind of change can we believe in when they are all politically tied to certain policies and agendas?<span> </span>What kind of change can we achieve if the new ideas are the same ideas we’ve had for decades?<span> </span>Change implies new people, new policy, new agendas, and new direction.<span> </span>Change simply cannot be a regurgitation of the same old people, policy, agenda, and direction.<span> </span>Obama ran his campaign on change and the only thing he has changed is his postal mailing address come inauguration day… oh, and a new family puppy.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>I am severely disappointed in the backbone of our President Elect for not living up to his simple promise of change.<span> </span>He has chosen to disregard his entire campaign’s platform because in reality, he NEVER was going to bring about change.<span> </span>A man in his position makes promises to voter groups and people of great power.<span> </span>In exchange for their support, he must provide something in return.<span> </span>His only form of repayment is to acquiesce to their demands if he wants his political career to continue.<span> </span>President Elect or not, he still must serve those who brought him into power… which isn’t necessarily the voters.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>We all like to believe that our President is a man, or woman, who can be the flash point, the catalyst, the true direction maker of our country.<span> </span>But we know that’s not the truth in our heart of hearts.<span> </span>Our President is nothing more than a puppet, a face, a figurehead.<span> </span>The true power resides in the Congress and thus, in the voter’s hands.<span> </span>The President does have executive power, but true lawmaking ability and direction decisions are made by hundreds of other citizen elected officials sitting in the seats of the House of Representatives and Senate.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>Obama promised change, but has done nothing but do more of the same.<span> </span>The change we can believe in requires our votes to oust the partisan political members in the Congress and start anew.<span> </span>Start with people who truly care about our country and most importantly, our Constitution.<span> </span>We focus too much on a single person when in fact he can do very little with his single voice, his single vote, or his single request.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.synapticdomination.com/2008/11/change-is-the-same/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conservative Agenda</title>
		<link>http://www.synapticdomination.com/2008/11/conservative-agenda/</link>
		<comments>http://www.synapticdomination.com/2008/11/conservative-agenda/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 19:30:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political Beefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill of Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservative Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Faith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Murder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synapticdomination.com/?p=289</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Now that we understand the Liberal Agenda and the associated underlying policies, let’s take a look at the “competing” Conservative Agenda. We will focus upon the same five issues that were laid out during our discussion of the Liberal Agenda. Before we begin, I want to mention one thing… the Conservative Agenda does not [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>Now that we understand the Liberal Agenda and the associated underlying policies, let’s take a look at the “competing” Conservative Agenda.<span> </span>We will focus upon the same five issues that were laid out during our discussion of the Liberal Agenda.<span> </span>Before we begin, I want to mention one thing… the Conservative Agenda does not equate to the “shoving” of religion down your throat.<span> </span>Yes, there are some religious issues within the policies and their stances upon them, but it is not a mandate of religion for those who disagree or are not religious.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>You may say there should be 0% religion in government because of the Constitution’s requirement of separation of Church and State.<span> </span>I say yes, the government cannot force religion upon our citizens, but our citizens can utilize religion and faith when voting and deciding policy.<span> </span>Taking a look at the latest statistics, 78.4% of Americans state that they are Christians.<span> </span>The rest is broken up into about 5% belonging to other faith traditions and 16.1% being unaffiliated with any specific religion.<span> </span>Our nation has always been and currently still is a Christian nation.<span> </span>Our forefathers and leadership during our nation’s formation were deeply rooted in their Christian faith, but they did not “shove” religion down our throats… going as far as making sure that it cannot happen.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Issue:<span> </span>Abortion</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>This may be the most divisive issue between the Conservative and Liberal Agendas.<span> </span>Unlike the Liberal Agenda believers, conservatives believe in Pro-Life.<span> </span>Many conservatives equate life with conception and not at birth.<span> </span>With life beginning at conception, abortion is nothing more than the murder of an innocent child.<span> </span>The innocence of life should be protected and not equated to a simple choice or right of the mother because it’s her “body.”<span> </span>What about the life of the child growing inside?<span> </span>Does it not have any rights?</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>Contradicting laws of our nation add to the volatility of this issue.<span> </span>Abortion is ok because the mother is “choosing” to abort because it’s her “body.”<span> </span>However, if a mother who is pregnant is murdered, the criminal faces two charges of murder.<span> </span>Or, if a pregnant mother is attacked and the baby is lost, the criminal faces a murder charge.<span> </span>On one hand, the child has no significance only because the mother decides that she doesn’t want the baby.<span> </span>On the other, the child is equivalent of a born human being, possessing all natural rights.<span> </span>The unborn baby either possesses all natural rights or does not.<span> </span>The Conservative Agenda says the unborn life possesses ALL natural rights.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Issue:<span> </span>Progressive Taxes</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>Unlike the Liberal Agenda, the Conservative Agenda does not believe in taxation to “spread the wealth.”<span> </span>Actually, removing the entire taxation system and replacing it with a “sales tax” is gaining momentum and traction amongst the true conservative nation.<span> </span>The idea here is to pay taxes upon the products you buy and not pay taxes on the amount of income you earn.<span> </span>Liberals utilize the broken progressive tax system to “earn” votes by “cutting” taxes for the poor and middle class…<span> </span>Look at your wallet and the past… when did you pay more taxes and when did you not?</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Issue:<span> </span>Gun Control</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>Gun Control is another major issue dividing the liberals and conservatives.<span> </span>Liberals believe everyone will be safe as long as the people (not Joe Schmoe citizen) they determine should have weapons have them and nobody else does (I guess illegal weapons never cross their mind).<span> </span>Conservatives believe in the 2<sup>nd</sup> Amendment and believe it is an American citizen’s right to own and bear arms.<span> </span>No, they are not saying we should have fully automatic weapons, tanks, and explosives.<span> </span>They are supporting our right to own civilian weapons if we are law abiding citizens because our Constitution and Bill of Rights says we can.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Issue:<span> </span>Homosexual Marriage</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>Like abortion, there are some religious motivations for opposing gay marriage.<span> </span>However, that does not mean the conservatives are forcing religion upon you.<span> </span>Our nation was founded upon Christian faith and ideology and the sanctity of marriage should be protected as such.<span> </span>Given that nearly 80% of our nation still considers itself Christian, it’s not a leap of faith to assume that the sanctity of marriage should be protected as one man, one woman.<span> </span>Marriage is not “just” a state recognized union, it is a Christian union.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Issue:<span> </span>Government Control</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>Conservatives profess that downsizing government is an ultimate desire.<span> </span>Decreasing the impact government has in our lives enhances our freedom as a nation.<span> </span>Conservatives believe that private enterprise produces competition and therefore we receive the benefits of better products and services.<span> </span>Government sponsored policies and services only add to the “fat” our government already abundantly has.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>As you can see, there are night and day differences between the Liberal and Conservative Agendas.<span> </span>However, unlike what the media would have you believe, the conservatives are not about “shoving” religion down your throat and forcing you to abide by their beliefs.<span> </span>Yes, religion plays a factor in how their decisions are made regarding policy, but they are not creating legislation that forces the American citizen to abide by the Christian faith.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Citation:<span> </span><a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-religion26feb26,0,4582086.story">http://www.latimes.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.synapticdomination.com/2008/11/conservative-agenda/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Liberal Agenda</title>
		<link>http://www.synapticdomination.com/2008/11/liberal-agenda/</link>
		<comments>http://www.synapticdomination.com/2008/11/liberal-agenda/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 19:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political Beefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wealth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synapticdomination.com/?p=285</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let’s talk a little bit about this so-called “Liberal Agenda” I’ve been writing about in my past articles. Some people only know the terms Liberal and Conservative and Democrat or Republican. Some do not know the different factions that exist within each Party. A Democrat does not necessarily have to subscribe to the Liberal Agenda [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal">Let’s talk a little bit about this so-called “Liberal Agenda” I’ve been writing about in my past articles.<span> </span>Some people only know the terms Liberal and Conservative and Democrat or Republican.<span> </span>Some do not know the different factions that exist within each Party.<span> </span>A Democrat does not necessarily have to subscribe to the Liberal Agenda and a Republican doesn’t have to adhere to the conservative right’s agenda to belong to the political Party.<span> </span>However these days with the middle of the road politician seemingly on the endangered species lists, you are more likely to find a very high percentage of liberal Democrats and conservative Republicans with very few in the middle.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">With that out of the way, what are the issues that determines which Democrat believes in Liberal Agenda policies?<span> </span>I’m not going to go into great detail on each one as I don’t want to enrage or put to sleep those who may be reading.<span> </span>The issues are in no order of importance and only appear as I randomly write them from my mind to digital paper.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Issue:<span> </span>Abortion</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">The Liberals would like you to believe that abortion has nothing to do with the child being grown in a mother’s body.<span> </span>They want you to focus upon the rights the mother has as it pertains to her body.<span> </span>While every human being has specific rights when it comes to their own body, a child changes the equation and the rights of that mother.<span> </span>Unborn babies have rights of their own and cannot be discounted.<span> </span>Abortion is the destruction of an unborn baby’s rights.<span> </span>Support abortion and support the minimizing of a child’s life.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Issue:<span> </span>Progressive Taxes</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Democrats subscribing to the Liberal Agenda believe that it is the “patriotic duty” of the “wealthy” to pay massive penalties in the form of taxes to cover the hardships of the less wealthy citizenship.<span> </span>Spread the wealth is a socialist/Marxist/Communist tenet and is a focal point of the Liberal Agenda.<span> </span>If you enjoy free markets and American capitalism, you will vehemently oppose this ideology.<span> </span>Wealthy people “spread the wealth” by donations and by providing jobs for the society, not by being forced to return their earned wealth to the government for “appropriate” redistribution.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Issue:<span> </span>Gun Control</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Many Liberals will try and make you believe that guns are at the root of all evil.<span> </span>An outright ban or severe limitation of who can own a weapon is another core item on the liberal’s agenda.<span> </span>Now, the liberals in power will of course be allowed to retain their gun ownerships, but the general citizen will not be allowed to exercise their constitutional right to own a weapon.<span> </span>Just to make a note, I don’t believe a citizen should own military grade, fully automatic weapons or explosives.<span> </span>Making a gun scary looking does not make it a military weapon.<span> </span>Semi-automatic guns are well within our rights as law abiding citizens.<span> </span>If a ban of the weapon itself cannot be achieved by the liberals, watch for ammunition bans…</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Issue:<span> </span>Homosexual Marriage</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Liberals wish to rewrite the general concept that marriage consists of one man and one woman entering into a lifelong commitment (a commitment which our Christian forefathers helped found this nation upon).<span> </span>They wish to include same-sex couples and redefine the institution of marriage.<span> </span>The reasoning for this primarily resides around the fact that same-sex couples are not afforded the same “rights” natural married couple enjoy.<span> </span>Tax credits from joint filing, child credits, and the list goes on.<span> </span>Civil unions are not enough… they want marriage redefined to include homosexual couples.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Issue:<span> </span>Government Control</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Every issue the Liberal Agenda entails basically comes from this all encompassing issue.<span> </span>Liberals believe that the government should have ultimate control of our society.<span> </span>The rights of the citizens are trivialized because the liberals believe they can satisfy the public by doing everything for them.<span> </span>They believe a country RUN by the government makes things “better” for everyone.<span> </span>I believe the government is here to protect our rights, not disseminate them to us.<span> </span>If we subscribe to the Liberal Agenda, we are headed for a Marxist regime in sheep’s clothing.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">There are many other issues involving affirmative action, government sponsored healthcare, foreign policy, and immigration just to name a few.<span> </span>But, I believe the above issues are more than enough to determine if you are of the mind to accept the Liberal Agenda or not.<span> </span>If you do not, it doesn’t make you a conservative or even a Republican.<span> </span>There are lots of Democrats who do not subscribe to the Liberal Agenda.<span> </span>However, more and more of the Democratic Party politicians are fully invested in the Liberal Agenda and these issues are their policy decision makers.<span> </span>Keep your eyes open to the true issues and remember you have rights not because the government gave them to you, but because you are an American citizen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.synapticdomination.com/2008/11/liberal-agenda/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>First Rock Star President</title>
		<link>http://www.synapticdomination.com/2008/11/first-rock-star-president/</link>
		<comments>http://www.synapticdomination.com/2008/11/first-rock-star-president/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 15:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political Beefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acceptance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Compromise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Integrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Popularity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Respect]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synapticdomination.com/?p=282</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Today marks the first time in American history that we have elected a rock star for President. In our past, we have elected war heroes, great public speakers, men with great ideals for our country, and we have even elected men who were previously known as actors. Now we can add to this distinguished [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>Today marks the first time in American history that we have elected a rock star for President.<span> </span>In our past, we have elected war heroes, great public speakers, men with great ideals for our country, and we have even elected men who were previously known as actors.<span> </span>Now we can add to this distinguished list, rock star.<span> </span>While Barack Obama is not in the company of certified platinum selling musicians, his persona and public stature is equivalent to that of being the much sought after fifth Beatle.<span> </span>His star power and public attraction are only equaled by the mass gatherings of people who attend reunion tours of The Rolling Stones, Bruce Springsteen, or even the reminiscent arrival of The Beatles.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>Obama has the eyes of the world upon him.<span> </span>He is not only our rock star… he is the world’s rock star.<span> </span>In our time of globalization, Obama is sitting on top of the world’s political pulpit.<span> </span>After a projected record amount of voters have utilized their one true democratic tool, Obama has been elected the leader of the free world.<span> </span>After many campaign promises have been made in exchange for votes, our eyes as a nation are going to be squarely placed upon him.<span> </span>Obama will face the ultimate political scrutiny… not only from the American public, but from the world as a whole.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>I watched Obama give his gracious acceptance speech last night.<span> </span>He is a very good speaker and he can motivate with his words and demeanor when he’s speaking.<span> </span>However, his actions are now required.<span> </span>No longer is campaign and political rhetoric going to be enough.<span> </span>There must be substance to his speeches and there must be evidence of his political ability.<span> </span>At this point in time, we have yet to see either because of his lack of political service.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>What exactly Obama will accomplish over the next four years remains to be seen.<span> </span>Many are awaiting some sort of Holy Grail to materialize and make our nation resemble a fairytale of the grandest proportions.<span> </span>Others are nervously and anxiously awaiting what true agenda Obama may be harboring.<span> </span>Obama, based upon his past votes and publicly stated positions, is still regarded as a “Hard Core Liberal.”<span> </span>His political viewpoints and Democratic Party affiliation still direct his decision making that will undoubtedly create great public and political divide.<span> </span>Promises of bi-partisanship is one thing, actually compromising on some of the most important divides is another.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>We have seen how political divides have separated this country. <span> </span>For many, their newfound ecstasy achieved as a result of their chosen affiliation’s rise to power will come under distress as the reality of the political process diminishes the many campaign road promises.<span> </span>Yes, Obama will be in office with a dominant position regarding both the House and the Senate.<span> </span>However, he does not enjoy a veto-proof House and Senate.<span> </span>That means that any law or political action he champions MUST be made with inherent compromises in place.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>Obama is our next President and he deserves the respect this office places upon him.<span> </span>However, the respect of the person himself is on the line.<span> </span>If Obama can truly earn the respect of his opposition as a true political leader charged with bringing our country forward together, then I will gladly stand in line and support Obama.<span> </span>Until that day comes, I am a skeptical citizen waiting to see what the true agenda of the Democratic Party’s most liberal President has in store for our country.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>The President is sworn to uphold the Constitution upon inauguration.<span> </span>Our nation was born upon the ideology of freedom.<span> </span>Free markets are at the core of our capitalistic economy.<span> </span>As our country moves forward, I implore you to watch with keen eyes how your rights are being protected, how your country’s foundation is being protected, and how your country’s moral and ethical values are being protected.<span> </span>Many of Obama’s campaign promises directly affect each one of these core issues.<span> </span>If our American citizens are so easily fleeced of our rights for monetary gains, we will no longer have a Constitution, a free market, or a free country.<span> </span>Be thankful that we have democracy and we must make sure that we preserve it.<span> </span>We must not allow the rock star persona draw a veil of deception over our nation’s eyes which will allow its complete rape and destruction from within.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.synapticdomination.com/2008/11/first-rock-star-president/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
