<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Synaptic Domination &#187; Democrat</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.synapticdomination.com/tag/democrat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.synapticdomination.com</link>
	<description>Ideas, Opinions, Discussions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 03:41:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Bubble Gum Obama</title>
		<link>http://www.synapticdomination.com/2009/03/bubble-gum-obama/</link>
		<comments>http://www.synapticdomination.com/2009/03/bubble-gum-obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 01:28:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political Beefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baseball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rational]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vote]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synapticdomination.com/?p=343</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ When I was a kid, I faithfully did my chores to earn my $3 allowance each week. What I chose to spend my hard earned money on was something many young boys did… baseball cards. My mom took me to the grocery store for each week’s grocery run and I promptly headed to the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>When I was a kid, I faithfully did my chores to earn my $3 allowance each week.<span> </span>What I chose to spend my hard earned money on was something many young boys did… baseball cards.<span> </span>My mom took me to the grocery store for each week’s grocery run and I promptly headed to the aisle where the cards were placed to entice point of sale purchases.<span> </span>Of course as a kid, I had no idea about this type of marketing genius, I just knew that I loved baseball and I wanted to have the player cards of my favorite players and team… which by the way is and always will be the St. Louis Cardinals.<span> </span>In the beginning, each pack of cards came with a very satisfying addition, a stick of bubble gum.<span> </span>The gum was mostly un-chewable because they were so stale and factory sealed packs weren’t around yet, they were simply glued to keep the cards together.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>Now, being a full grown adult, I haven’t bought a pack of cards in about 25 years.<span> </span>But, that almost changed the other day as my wife and I went down the aisle I didn’t even know existed at our local Wal-Mart… the ultimate kid’s dream, an aisle filled with cards of all shapes, sizes, and type.<span> </span>I stared at the various boxes and thought to myself how much money I had wasted through the years on these simple little pieces of cardboard.<span> </span>Even knowing that, I almost bought a pack of cards.<span> </span>Not baseball cards mind you, but Barack Obama cards.<span> </span>Yes, our new President has his own special edition inauguration card set.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>I picked up the pack intent on buying them… not because I’m a fan, more of a joke kind of thing.<span> </span>However, my rationale soon kicked in and I placed the pack back in its box and laughed at myself for even coming so close to spending money on such a trivial item.<span> </span>The package of cards was priced at $1.98 and came with 6 cards and a special sticker.<span> </span>Of course, there is a set to collect and the entire collection consists of 90 cards and 18 stickers.<span> </span>Sounds fabulous for the card buying public doesn’t it?</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>Looking online, I can find many places selling these small “moments of history.”<span> </span>I am simply amazed by the fact that there are trading cards available of Barack Obama.<span> </span>I know he’s become one of the most widely recognized political figures of all times, but are “baseball” cards really necessary?<span> </span>To me, these cards are nothing more than political propaganda created to spread the ideology of the Liberal Democratic movement.<span> </span>The more these types of things are constantly placed in our daily lives, the more we as a society come to accept it.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>Winning the hearts and minds of a society has long been an avenue to win a war.<span> </span>While our country is not exactly at war with each other, we are definitely separated by a clear division between ideologies… Liberal versus Conservative.<span> </span>Over the last generation, both sides have had their chance at power and they’ve each done their best to destroy the “losing” side.<span> </span>However, as all things do, their power ebbs and flows as society eventually becomes disenchanted with the policies of each after tasting them for too long.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>Conservatism was in power for quite a long run earlier this decade, but over the last few years, Liberalism has retaken the political landscape.<span> </span>This time, unlike any in the past, they are using their vast coffers of cash in an effort to control the media and publicity for their cause.<span> </span>They are focusing on winning the hearts and minds of everyone who doesn’t investigate and decide on their own what they believe in.<span> </span>The general public is being force-fed the liberal agenda and many of them are willingly falling in line as the promises of government handouts entice their votes.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>Obama baseball cards may appear to be innocuous, but political propaganda is never harmless.<span> </span>As Hitler arose to power in pre WWII Germany, political propaganda was utilized to sway the hearts and minds of its citizens so that his political policies would be readily accepted.<span> </span>I’m not saying Obama is the second coming of Hitler by any means, but the tactics he and his party are utilizing are straight out of the textbooks utilized by the tyrants of our past.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>While writing this article, I was given the pleasure of watching a commercial for The Tonight Show telling me that our President will be a guest on Thursday night.<span> </span>Maybe it’s me, but I don’t see the point of our sitting President being a guest on a late night talk show.<span> </span>There are more important things to utilize his time for.<span> </span>The only thing this type of appearance can be used for is the furthering of his agenda and giving us more political propaganda.<span> </span>He is always in our face, always in our news, always in our ear… the more he is around us, the more we accept him… at least that’s the hope of his Party and his Liberal friends pushing their agendas.<span> </span>Be aware, don’t succumb to complacency and miss what the true story is… always question authority when power and money are to be gained.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.synapticdomination.com/2009/03/bubble-gum-obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ears for Obama</title>
		<link>http://www.synapticdomination.com/2009/03/ears-for-obama/</link>
		<comments>http://www.synapticdomination.com/2009/03/ears-for-obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 02:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political Beefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stimulus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vote]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synapticdomination.com/?p=340</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ No, I’m not talking about Obama’s protuberances from each side of his head… I’m talking about the earmarks he so blatantly campaigned against, but signed into law the first chance he was given. The federal government, in need of a spending bill to keep the doors open for business, sent through a $400 plus [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>No, I’m not talking about Obama’s protuberances from each side of his head… I’m talking about the earmarks he so blatantly campaigned against, but signed into law the first chance he was given.<span> </span>The federal government, in need of a spending bill to keep the doors open for business, sent through a $400 plus bill laced with greedy earmarks by the very politicians clamoring for stimulus money for their states to survive.<span> </span>Earmarks are essentially line items that cannot pass on their own and appropriate federal money for personal political agendas.<span> </span>They are attached to larger bills that are seemingly unstoppable so that they slide through under the “watchful” eyes of other politicians.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>During the Obama campaign to become President, he consistently spoke about how he wanted serious earmark reform and how he was going to limit the total earmark spending to that of 1994 levels.<span> </span>His opponent, John McCain, vowed to cut earmarks off completely.<span> </span>They are frivolous wastes of money.<span> </span>If they cannot pass on their own, they should not be force-fed to the American public through the blatant misuse of political power and agenda pushing.<span> </span>In 1994, about $7.8 billion was spent on earmarks… I guess that promise is out the window.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>The $400 billion bill contains nearly 9,000 earmark line items that account for almost $8 billion of American taxpayer funds.<span> </span>These are the line items that have been identified by various groups and are public knowledge.<span> </span>Obama himself has acknowledged the existence of these non-essential additions of expenses… his excuse is that he did not have time to examine and prioritize the current bill.<span> </span>The timing of the bill was of the utmost importance to keep the doors of the government open…<span> </span>Do you care if the government’s doors are open?<span> </span>Aren’t they closed for the majority of the year anyway while the politicians are off vacationing on taxpayer dollars or off throwing parties sponsored by the ultra-rich lobbyist parties?</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>How did this bill come about?<span> </span>How come the President, who is the figurehead of the Democratic Party, can’t convince his own Party to do away with unworthy earmarks throwing tax dollars away?<span> </span>The Democrats are the ones in power in both the House and Senate… and they have been since 2006.<span> </span>I suppose the Republicans are at fault or the Bush administration had something to do with the Democrats flaunting their newfound power and pushing their precious agenda forward at the expense of an already suffering nation.<span> </span>$8 billion more down the drain… in a time when unemployment is on the rise and the stock market is at 12 year lows.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>I cannot understand how people can turn a blind eye to what is going on now that the Democratic Party has ultimate control.<span> </span>Obama has turned his back on his campaign promises in an effort to satisfy his true liberal political roots.<span> </span>He is cashing in the American dream to satisfy the debts he owes… the debts he created in becoming President.<span> </span>Oh, you may be one of the naïve people who believe Obama won on his own merits and political rhetoric… hardly.<span> </span>He is a figurehead pushed upon us by a vast legion of liberal elitists.<span> </span>He’s a transparent blowhard politician through and through and they always answer to someone.<span> </span>I’m not a tin foil hat wearer, but where money and power exist, there are people conspiring to gather more of each at all costs.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>Obama, our political savior has become nothing more than a rubber stamp for his liberal friends and their policies… well, his policies.<span> </span>At just more than 50 days, Obama’s approval rating has already begun to slip.<span> </span>His own Party is becoming antsy in how he is handling the economic crisis.<span> </span>The $800 billion stimulus bill passed, but not in the manner that made Obama look “Presidential.”</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>There is nothing that can be done now, Obama will sign his name onto this new bill and we will see another $8 billion burn while many of us continue to lose our jobs, our retirements, and our house that is/was our family’s home.<span> </span>How many politicians do you know who have lost their house… their car… their retirement… anything for that matter?<span> </span>Not one.<span> </span>The Washington political families are safe forever, they have padded their wallets from raping the American citizens for decades… they have only the blackmailing lobbyists to worry about along with their own indecency.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>It’s another sad day for the American citizen whether you’re an Obama supporter or not.<span> </span>You are losing your rights, your future, and your Constitution just as I am.<span> </span>If the first 50 days are a representation of what we’ll get for the next 1,400 while Obama is President, there may not be 50 states in our Union.<span> </span>Some states do have sense and we all have a Constitutional right to defend what this country stands for.<span> </span>People forget that states voted to become a part of the Union, the smart ones may remember that we can vote ourselves out of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.synapticdomination.com/2009/03/ears-for-obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Presidential Placebo</title>
		<link>http://www.synapticdomination.com/2009/03/presidential-placebo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.synapticdomination.com/2009/03/presidential-placebo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 01:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political Beefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rational]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stimulus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wealth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synapticdomination.com/?p=338</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ As we experienced the full tilt run-up to our Presidential election at the end of last year, everyone was hoping that anointing Obama, our country’s savior in waiting, would cure our financial market woes as far as confidence was concerned. On Obama’s first day as our newly minted President, the Dow Jones Industrial Average [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>As we experienced the full tilt run-up to our Presidential election at the end of last year, everyone was hoping that anointing Obama, our country’s savior in waiting, would cure our financial market woes as far as confidence was concerned.<span> </span>On Obama’s first day as our newly minted President, the Dow Jones Industrial Average stood at 9,616.60 at the opening bell.<span> </span>While it was below the 10,000 watermark, it was nothing to be worried about as being a catastrophic situation.<span> </span>In just 16 days, on November 21, the DJIA had fallen to 7,552.37… an almost 22% decline.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>Now, we have passed the initial 50 days of Obama’s term and the DJIA stands at 6,595.16 as we prepare to enter an even more tumultuous economic period.<span> </span>As of right now, the DJIA has had nearly 32% of its value sheared off.<span> </span>Since November, over 2.5 million workers have lost their job… since the beginning of the recession (officially started December 2007) 4.4 million jobs have been lost.<span> </span>It’s fairly obvious that electing our “saving grace” did nothing to cure the confidence in our markets.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>These declines have occurred even with Obama pushing massive spending bills through Congress in an effort to stimulate our economy.<span> </span>Bush injected over $750 billion into the economy before he left office along with untold billions of dollars in ancillary stimulus money.<span> </span>Obama has trumped that bill by handing out nearly $800 billion and writing into the federal budget, another $750 billion for 2009.<span> </span>On top of that, Obama has agreed to spend over $400 billion in “health care reform.”<span> </span>Obama’s stimulus plan was pushed upon society as the great job saving machine that would generate 3.5 million jobs… over the next 2 years.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>Looking at the analyst’s forecast for the next 2 years, they predict that unemployment will reach 9% this year… it’s at 8.1% as of this article.<span> </span>Next year, they are predicting well over 10% unemployment.<span> </span>These are estimates that were made AFTER Obama’s stimulus plans… wrap your mind around that, or better yet, your wallet…<span> </span>People are unrealistically focused on the unemployment rate when they should be watching the under-employment rate.<span> </span>The under-employment rate takes into account people who have completely given up looking for work and also includes people who are working part time jobs who need full time jobs but cannot find one.<span> </span>This number represents the true state of our job market.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>So where does that number stand at today?<span> </span>Try 14.8% on for size.<span> </span>8.1% unemployment supposedly equals 12.5 million people according to the government stats.<span> </span>14.8% equals nearly 23 million people either out of work, given up on finding work, or involuntarily working part time jobs.<span> </span>These numbers are based on the idea that 155 million or so Americans work for a living.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>Right now, let’s just round off the spending that we know of to $3 trillion.<span> </span>That means that our government has spent almost $20,000 per working American in an effort to stop the bleeding.<span> </span>Have you seen this 20k in your bank account?<span> </span>Have you seen your taxes reduced by 20k this year?<span> </span>Have you seen your house value go up 20k or lose multiple times that in value?<span> </span>Has your stock portfolio increased by 20k or dropped even more?<span> </span>Where is this money going?<span> </span>If the money was going to those who “create” jobs, then why is the economy shedding our jobs at a much faster pace since the money was injected than before?</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>Common sense would make you think that the injection of these massive amounts of money should have at least given us a plateau in job losses.<span> </span>I understand that the Democrats in the house say that the current economic hardships are the results of the Bush administration’s legacy.<span> </span>Let’s put some rationale to that ideology.<span> </span>The Democrats were in charge of both the House and Senate and also controlled almost 75% of state governorships since 2006.<span> </span>The recession started in December 2007.<span> </span>The Bush administration’s legacy from 2000-2006 was far from a recession.<span> </span>In those years, the Republican Party controlled the majority of political power seats.<span> </span>Sure, the effects of everything takes time to truly pan out, but the turning point was the date the Democrats took control of our country and their inability to curtail their partisanship and hatred of Bush.<span> </span>They allowed their political feelings affect how they governed our country and now we are all paying the price for their failings.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>Where did our Presidential placebo go?<span> </span>The bounce we were so focused upon receiving did not happen.<span> </span>Rather than an uptick in our financial markets, a curtailing of our job losses, and a wealthier nation, we are now at a point where we are just entering the deepest valleys of this recession.<span> </span>I am convinced that we are going to see even worse times as we search for the rock bottom of our economic downturn.<span> </span>Millions more Americans will lose their jobs, billions more American taxpayer dollars will be spent without our agreement, and our stocks will continue to fall while we watch the foreclosure signs weather in our yards and our bank accounts shrink into penny savings.<span> </span>The placebo didn’t work and neither is spending money we don’t have.<span> </span>Placebo… we need the real deal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.synapticdomination.com/2009/03/presidential-placebo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who Pays</title>
		<link>http://www.synapticdomination.com/2009/02/who-pays/</link>
		<comments>http://www.synapticdomination.com/2009/02/who-pays/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 03:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political Beefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Excess]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stimulus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wealth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synapticdomination.com/?p=334</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Our nation had its first State of the Union address that wasn’t an official State of the Union address this week by our current 30’ish day President. Mr. Obama has used his star power as if he were a touring American Idol by glad handing the masses and placing his face on every news [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>Our nation had its first State of the Union address that wasn’t an official State of the Union address this week by our current 30’ish day President.<span> </span>Mr. Obama has used his star power as if he were a touring American Idol by glad handing the masses and placing his face on every news channel on a daily basis.<span> </span>Do we really need to be reminded that Obama is our President?<span> </span>Do we really need 24 hour news coverage of him and Michelle as if we are watching Survivor: White House edition?<span> </span>Personally, I thought that after the election, the media hype would die down a bit and we could go about our business as usual without having to listen to the campaign rhetoric on a daily basis… boy, was I wrong.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>Anyway, now that I’m done venting about how my news time is wasted by the incessant coverage of the second coming of MLK or Abraham Lincoln, I’ll get on with my topic… Who is going to pay for the “stimulus” bill and the associated tag along spending programs designated to end our recession?<span> </span>During the end of the Bush term, the first stimulus bill came to pass and we allocated over $700 billion tax payer dollars to solve the financial crisis.<span> </span>There were several other “smaller” bills throughout the last few months that brought the actual number to well over a trillion.<span> </span>Now, we have another $800 billion set to be spent to further solve the crisis.<span> </span>Oh but wait, there’s more.<span> </span>In the current Obama government budget, there’s another $750 billion being set aside for more failing banks and institutions.<span> </span>Add that up… Yes, it does come up to nearly $3 trillion American tax payer dollars.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>This is not to mention the emergency funds released by the Federal Reserve and International Monetary Fund to help ease the lending markets in our country and worldwide.<span> </span>Billions here, near trillions there, and yet we are still falling deeper into recession.<span> </span>Last I checked the yearly GDP of the United States stood at nearly $14 trillion for 2007.<span> </span>I would imagine 2008 will be similar if not less given the state of our economy during the second half of last year.<span> </span>In the last 3 or so months, we have mortgaged nearly a quarter of an entire year’s worth of American GDP.<span> </span>It doesn’t sound so bad, but it’s not like we were working on a budget in the first place.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>One of the major campaign points during the last election cycle focused on how the Democrats were going to balance the budget and reign in our growing deficit.<span> </span>Yes, even though America created nearly $14 trillion in GDP, we spent more!<span> </span>Now that things are getting even worse, you would think we would tighten the belt across the board… especially at the governmental level.<span> </span>It’s only common sense right?<span> </span>Nope… according to the Obama budget, we will be running a deficit of $1.75 trillion in 2009… and if you’re like me, you know that’s used car salesman speak for over $2 trillion.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>Bush never even came close to such numbers, and yet the Democrats are going to shatter the numbers they complained about for 8 years.<span> </span>Oh sure, I’ve heard it all… Obama inherited the problems and now he has to spend the money to bring us out of the terrible economy Bush saddled him with.<span> </span>Last I checked, Bush didn’t force the banks to run their risks to the ceiling and he didn’t force home owners to take loans with no down payment on houses that were priced 3 or 4 times what they could afford.<span> </span>Oh, and don’t forget to throw in that $4 per gallon gasoline we experienced.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>So, where exactly does all this money come from?<span> </span>It has to come from somewhere… that somewhere is our pockets.<span> </span>Democrats plan to make the “wealthy” pay the majority of the difference since everyone who makes under $250k are supposedly going to see tax breaks and more federal assistance in the form of health care and other subsidized worker laziness.<span> </span>Do you really think the wealthy individuals are going to simply turn over their bank accounts to pay for all of this?<span> </span>I highly doubt it.<span> </span>In the end, EVERYONE is going to be paying for these horrendous spending decisions.<span> </span>Maybe not on your paycheck under the federal tax line, but you’ll be paying higher state taxes, higher local taxes, and you’ll be paying to support a myriad of programs you have no willingness to do.<span> </span>Your money will be confiscated in many ways, but not by the word tax&#8230; yeah right.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>Obama runs his mouth like he’s the savior of our world and his photogenic face and vocal skills can actually make you feel like he means what he continually says to you (while reading the teleprompter).<span> </span>But, when the pen hits the paper, his policy support relays a much different reality.<span> </span>Obama speaks the right way, but acts as all hard line Liberal Democrats do.<span> </span>Pelosi and Obama have much in common, but I would guarantee you, even if you’re a hardcore Democrat, you wouldn’t vote for her to be our President…<span> </span>check the voting records, Pelosi and Obama are hand in hand.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>In the future, when your check and earning power has decreased because of these insane amounts of money being spent, remember where the initial money went.<span> </span>The initial money did not go to you and I, it went to corporate executives and failing businesses that played the risk game and lost.<span> </span>We will be paying for this, our children will be paying for this, and their grandchildren will be paying… assuming the United States is even a viable country at that point in time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.synapticdomination.com/2009/02/who-pays/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>First Month Jitters</title>
		<link>http://www.synapticdomination.com/2009/02/first-month-jitters/</link>
		<comments>http://www.synapticdomination.com/2009/02/first-month-jitters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2009 01:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political Beefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Failure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stimulus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wealth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synapticdomination.com/?p=332</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ This week completed the first official month of Barack Obama’s Presidency. Obama was riding a sentimental wave of enthusiasm into office with millions of supporters welcoming him into the White House as he swore upon the Bible to uphold the Constitution of the United States. After all the campaign promises were made with the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>This week completed the first official month of Barack Obama’s Presidency.<span> </span>Obama was riding a sentimental wave of enthusiasm into office with millions of supporters welcoming him into the White House as he swore upon the Bible to uphold the Constitution of the United States.<span> </span>After all the campaign promises were made with the assumption that he could easily direct the country’s lawmakers, the Democratic and Independent Obama voters were expecting nothing more than a smashing success which no political party has ever witnessed.<span> </span>Well, it appears there are a few bumps along the expected golden brick road to political “fairytaledom.”</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>Even with an overwhelming majority in both the House and Senate, Obama has faced some difficult experiences in his first month when trying to push through his ideology and policy decisions.<span> </span>Yes, the majority of what he wants has come to pass, but not without spending a considerable amount of his theoretical and generally worthless, political capital.<span> </span>There have been disastrous cabinet appointee failures and there have been unfavorable responses to some of his proposed stimulus bill policies among many other minor disturbances.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>I distinctly remember the night Obama invoked his awe inspiring acceptance speech on the night of our general election.<span> </span>I also distinctly remember him telling the millions of Americans who did not vote for him how he was going to be their President too.<span> </span>He told us that he was going to walk down the aisle of bi-partisanship.<span> </span>He told us he was going to bring change to Washington.<span> </span>He told us he was going to work for the people to make our nation what it once was.<span> </span>Little more than 30 days into his Presidency, is he keeping his promises he made that night?<span> </span>Is he keeping the promises he made on the campaign trail?</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>Well, number one, Obama brought no change to Washington as he did nothing more than appoint Washington insiders to every post he has been given a chance to fill.<span> </span>He has mined the standby Democratic powers that be to the fullest.<span> </span>Where is the new blood?<span> </span>Where is the “Yes we can” ideology?<span> </span>Why do we have to sit back and watch the same politicians who have been running our government for generations continue their abuse of power over the American citizen?<span> </span>Why… when the single most important aspect of Obama’s campaign was change?</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>If I had voted for Obama, I would be sitting pretty uncomfortable right now because the man I would have voted for is not the man sitting in the Oval Office at this point in time.<span> </span>Sure, he has another 47 months to change how we perceive him, but hey, there is something to first impressions…<span> </span>I’ve got some numbers from the latest polls that show all is not well with the savior of the free world’s first month.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>In only 30 days, Obama’s approval rating has dropped by nearly 10 percentage points.<span> </span>Two out of three Americans currently approve of how Obama is doing.<span> </span>That is still an extremely high number, but a nine percent drop in one month should be extremely worrisome for Obama supporters.<span> </span>Where did the drop come from?<span> </span>There are three segments polled, Democrats, Independents, and Republicans.<span> </span>Of course the Republican vote dropped the most from 50 percent to a drastically reduced 31 percent.<span> </span>Hey, even half of the Republican crowd gave Obama the benefit of the doubt… only to be shown his true colors in less than one month how the liberal Obama would govern our country.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>The other two segments dropped as follows:<span> </span>Independents (the ones who actually voted Obama into office) dropped to 61 from 67 percent.<span> </span>Democrats basically held steadfast to their banker, err, I mean President with 92 percent, slightly down from 96 percent.<span> </span>If I were a Democrat, I would be pretty happy with what has transpired during the first month because by selling my vote, I now have more federal money coming my way that I haven’t worked for at the expense of those who do.<span> </span>I’ve also got more tax rebates coming my way that I don’t deserve because I didn’t pay anything in taxes during the year.<span> </span>It’s a great system at this juncture for a Democrat and the Democratic voting bloc.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>First month jitters or the real Obama?<span> </span>Which one is it?<span> </span>My vote is that it’s the real Obama.<span> </span>The one with puppet strings tied to massive bank accounts of unknown campaign contributors.<span> </span>He is the one with ultra liberal policies who lied to the American public about his stance regarding bi-partisanship.<span> </span>As my bank account, 401k, home value, and confidence shrinks, there are others in the country receiving the benefits of selling their vote by sharing the shrinking wealth of those who work and earn their living.<span> </span>The first month jitters are costing millions of Americans jobs, money, and their future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.synapticdomination.com/2009/02/first-month-jitters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Day Of Change</title>
		<link>http://www.synapticdomination.com/2009/01/day-of-change/</link>
		<comments>http://www.synapticdomination.com/2009/01/day-of-change/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 01:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political Beefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kennedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synapticdomination.com/?p=321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ The day has come that Barack Obama will officially become the President of the United States. I am so unbelievably excited that I can hardly put into words how much this day excites me. No I’m not excited about the fact that he is becoming our nation’s leader and focal point of the free [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>The day has come that Barack Obama will officially become the President of the United States.<span> </span>I am so unbelievably excited that I can hardly put into words how much this day excites me.<span> </span>No I’m not excited about the fact that he is becoming our nation’s leader and focal point of the free world, but for many other reasons.<span> </span>This new day will bring upon us a day of closure.<span> </span>Again, no I’m not talking about the closure of the Bush administration, but for something altogether different.<span> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">If you have read more than a paragraph of any of my nearly 200 articles to this date, you know full well that Obama is not my favorite politician (He ranks in the same category as Nancy Pelosi, Ted Kennedy, and let’s throw someone of the same character in here, the ever brilliant political mind, Lindsay Lohan.)<span> </span>So if Obama is not my political savior and governmental messiah, why am I so excited about the day he takes the oath of office?</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Number one, I will NEVER have to hear another report by the so-called respectable news outlets about what dress Michelle Obama is going to wear to the inauguration.<span> </span>My ears have nearly bled from such innate conversation about nothing.<span> </span>As these reports wore on, I felt as if I were the one sitting in Guantanamo Bay being subjected to water boarding.<span> </span>Seriously, do we care?<span> </span>Is her dress going to hire two million people and replace the nearly 10 trillion dollars the stock market lost last year?<span> </span>Get over it, it’s just a dress.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Number two, I will NEVER have to hear another report about how there has never been a black President in our country (although Obama is only half black…).<span> </span>I could care less about the color of this man’s skin.<span> </span>Racism is alive and well in this country and for those who think this is the nail in racism’s coffin, continue living in your dream world and send me a check on behalf of your consummate stupidity.<span> </span>We all would like racism to be a dead and gone civil issue, but we must face the fact that it still exists.<span> </span>Sweeping an issue under the rug does not mean it’s cured.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Number three, Obama will now be given the chance to put his so-called money where his mouth is.<span> </span>I can run my mouth as well as Obama can, but he has now been given the position to where he can either come through on his promises or fail like all the other politicians.<span> </span>Yes, all the previous politicians have failed to achieve their campaign promises simply because they cannot change everything in such a short time.<span> </span>There is too much money and too much power on both sides of the aisle to allow the sweeping governmental change that Obama has promised.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">There are many other issues that I am sick of hearing about and I’m sure will still garner air time over the next few months and even years, but the time has come for Obama to show what he is made of.<span> </span>Is he a paper politician led by the vast wallets that helped get him elected?<span> </span>Is he deserving of the accolades he has received and the comparisons to MLK, JFK, and even Abraham Lincoln?<span> </span>Will his first term be his last?<span> </span>How will Obama deal with the enemies of our country abroad?<span> </span>Does he have what it truly takes to defend our Constitution or will he shred it like his policies and voting record portends?</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Our mainstream media will be riding the coattails of Obama for quite a while so we won’t get a true feel for his administration for quite some time.<span> </span>But, I figure about two years into his Presidency, our nation will know whether we elected a true leader or just another Jimmy Carter.<span> </span>While I don’t agree with Obama’s policies, I do hope that he and his administration achieve what is best for our country.<span> </span>Policy and politics aside, I’m an American citizen and we need good to come of this.<span> </span>I can only hope that America is a stronger nation because of the next four years and not a weaker one.<span> </span>So, let’s get on with this show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.synapticdomination.com/2009/01/day-of-change/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Value Destruction</title>
		<link>http://www.synapticdomination.com/2008/12/value-destruction/</link>
		<comments>http://www.synapticdomination.com/2008/12/value-destruction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 00:36:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Everyday Nonsense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill O'Reilly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Book]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture Warrior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Selfish]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synapticdomination.com/?p=307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ While reading Bill O’Reilly’s book “Culture Warrior,” I ran across a simple statement conjured up from O’Reilly’s mind which makes ultimate sense in an uncommon sense world, “To conquer a nation, destroy the values of its people.” Doesn’t that simplistic statement make absolute sense? How can a nation survive if the values it was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>While reading Bill O’Reilly’s book “Culture Warrior,” I ran across a simple statement conjured up from O’Reilly’s mind which makes ultimate sense in an uncommon sense world, “To conquer a nation, destroy the values of its people.”<span> </span>Doesn’t that simplistic statement make absolute sense?<span> </span>How can a nation survive if the values it was formed and based upon are destroyed and no longer allowed, supported, or even accepted?</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>Upon first glance at that sentence, I would imagine we all turn our focus to an external enemy… an enemy from across the shores, a physical and political enemy.<span> </span>However, I believe the enemy is actually our own citizens within our society today.<span> </span>O’Reilly wrote this knowing that and has identified the threat as an entity he labels the “Secular Progressives” or S-P for short.<span> </span>I will label this segment of our society as our “insurgents.”</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>Yes, I label them with such drastic measure because the effects of their ultra liberal policies destroy the basic American moral values which we were founded upon.<span> </span>The American insurgency, aka insurrectionists or secessionists in my opinion, are looking to change the landscape into that of total anarchy.<span> </span>Our way of life, if they have their way, will change forever into something that could split the nation in a way we haven’t seen since the Civil War.<span> </span>No longer is slavery or women’s rights at stake, our nation’s moral and ethical value system is at stake.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>Fighting for our individual rights is one thing, fighting for the continued life of our nation is another.<span> </span>The insurgents are pushing policies which are held by a very small percentage of our society.<span> </span>However, that percentage is growing and is funded by some of the wealthiest people in America.<span> </span>They have the ability to get their message out because they are in de facto control of the nation’s media outlets.<span> </span>They control the television air waves, a large portion of the radio waves, and have created propaganda spewing internet sites which are in place to lure unsuspecting youth into their control.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>This is not a fight of Republican versus Democrat.<span> </span>It is not a fight between Conservatives and Liberals.<span> </span>This is a fight between the standard American citizen who holds our moral and ethical value set close to their heart and those who wish to remove all moral and ethical standards while replacing them with what is by default, chaos and anarchy.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>Over 80% of our nation’s citizens consider themselves Christians.<span> </span>As such, they are bound by certain basic moral and ethical standards.<span> </span>If our nation has its moral and ethical standards destroyed by a small, but extremely powerful insurgency, expect a revolution by those who wish to uphold what the United States of America stands for.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>Creating a society where anarchy and chaos rules serves two major purposes… greed and selfishness.<span> </span>If there are no moral and ethical rules to follow, what exactly is there to keep the average human being in line other than a basic understanding of what is right and wrong?<span> </span>And even then, right and wrong can be argued and litigated until wrong is right and right is wrong.<span> </span>Our society will simply focus on individual satisfaction at all costs because it’s our “right.”</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>Do we need the government to uphold our standard moral and ethical views?<span> </span>Do we need laws in place to tell us how to live correctly?<span> </span>It appears that we do because if the insurgents had their way, our country would already be in chaos.<span> </span>No longer does it appear that we have the innate sense to know what is right and wrong while living in society.<span> </span>No longer does it appear that we can govern ourselves in a free society effectively as the insurgents continue to gain power.<span> </span>No longer does it appear that we know how to live without greed and selfishness.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>In the end, the country will make a decision.<span> </span>Will those of us who stand for something greater than the individual stand up for our country or will we simply allow the insurgency decide for us how to live our lives?<span> </span>I’m not telling you to stand up and start a militia in preparation for a revolution, I am telling you to use the most powerful tool in your arsenal… your vote.<span> </span>Yes, we just finished one our biggest elections, but it never stops.<span> </span>Speak up, write letters, attend a rally, do something other than allow the insurgents have their way because we are too lazy or pacified.<span> </span>They are the weaker force… we must band together and stop them before it’s too late.<span> </span>At that point in time, we may be beyond the simple casting a vote phase and into a full blown revolution.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span> </span>The American way of life is worth fighting for.<span> </span>No, not the “American life” of greed and selfishness, but the way of life our forefathers fought and died to protect.<span> </span>If we do our part, our country can be reclaimed and once again be that shining beacon of hope to all who want freedom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.synapticdomination.com/2008/12/value-destruction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Liberal Obama Agenda</title>
		<link>http://www.synapticdomination.com/2008/11/liberal-obama-agenda/</link>
		<comments>http://www.synapticdomination.com/2008/11/liberal-obama-agenda/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 00:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political Beefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Concealed Carry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wealth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synapticdomination.com/?p=287</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Staying with the Liberal Agenda course, you may have asked the question, “Is Barack Obama, our President-elect, a Liberal Agenda subscriber?” Let’s find out by going through the Liberal Agenda issues we have recently spoken about. We aren’t going to base this upon opinion or hearsay, but actual votes, decisions, and spoken words from Obama [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal">Staying with the Liberal Agenda course, you may have asked the question, “Is Barack Obama, our President-elect, a Liberal Agenda subscriber?”<span> </span>Let’s find out by going through the Liberal Agenda issues we have recently spoken about.<span> </span>We aren’t going to base this upon opinion or hearsay, but actual votes, decisions, and spoken words from Obama himself.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Issue:<span> </span>Abortion</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">This particular issue is at the forefront of Obama’s policies and one he has recently spoken about.<span> </span>His past voting history while in public office have all been pro-choice/pro-abortion (the opposite side will ALWAYS argue that they are pro-choice because of the “inherent” woman’s choice, but in the end, we all see past the smoke and mirror show and know they are pro-abortion).</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">He has publicly stated his support of Roe v. Wade (thus ensuring abortion remains legal).<br />
He has voted against banning partial-birth abortions.<br />
He voted NO on prohibiting minors from crossing state lines for abortion.<br />
He voted NO on requiring minors to inform parents of out of state abortions.<br />
He is rated 0% by the National Right to Life Committee (NRLC) indicating pro-choice.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Is Obama a Liberal Agenda supporter on the Abortion issue?<span> </span>Check.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Issue:<span> </span>Progressive Taxes</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">If anyone followed the Presidential campaign over the last two years, you have no doubt where Obama stands here.<span> </span>However, if you have not, here are the facts.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">He supports a “spread the wealth” tax system (progressive tax system in the purest form).<br />
In October, 2007, he stated he wants to “restore progressive taxes.”<br />
He is rated 100% by the Citizens for Tax Justice (CTJ) indicating support of progressive taxation.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Is Obama a Liberal Agenda supporter on the Progressive Taxes Issue?<span> </span>Check.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Issue:<span> </span>Gun Control</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Obama is a Senator from Illinois, one of the strictest states concerning gun ownership.<span> </span>Illinois does not allow legal citizens an opportunity to obtain a concealed carry license (Wisconsin is the only other).<span> </span>The entire nation other than these two states and Washington D.C. allow law abiding citizens to obtain a concealed carry license to help ensure their personal protection.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">He states that it is “ok for states &amp; cities to determine local gun laws.”<br />
Obama has openly supported Illinois’ gun ban laws.<br />
He states that he respects the 2<sup>nd</sup> Amendment but “local gun bans are ok…”<br />
He wishes to ban semi-automatic weapons.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Is Obama a Liberal Agenda supporter on the Gun Control Issue?<span> </span>Check.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Issue:<span> </span>Homosexual Marriage</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Obama plays a fine line in this particular issue.<span> </span>He has chosen to be one of the “grayish” leaning Liberal Agenda members here while supporting Homosexual Marriage without actually saying it.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">He OPPOSES the California one man, one woman marriage law.<br />
He OPPOSED the Illinois Definition of Marriage Act (DOMA).<br />
He states that it is “ok to expose 6-year-olds to gay couples…”<br />
He states that he opposes gay marriage but supports civil unions…</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Is Obama a Liberal Agenda supporter on the Homosexual Marriage Issue?<span> </span>Check’ish (voting record supports while his spoken record is highly conflicted).</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Issue:<span> </span>Government Control</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Obama belongs to the Democratic Party so this one by default becomes true.<span> </span>His stances on providing government sponsored services are all in favor of governmental control over our decision making… taxation, healthcare, education, welfare, subsidies, affirmative action, etc.<span> </span>Obama fully supports government control in our daily American lives.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Is Obama a Liberal Agenda supporter on the Government Control Issue?<span> </span>Check.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">After filtering through the data from Obama’s spoken and voting past, it is easily seen that he proudly wears the Liberal Agenda designation.<span> </span>As I have stated before, OnTheIssues.org has labeled him as “Hardcore Liberal” based upon his voting and spoken record.<span> </span>As a comparison, our current President is labeled “Hardcore Conservative.”</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">For the last eight years and mainly the last two during the campaign process, we have heard how divisive Bush and his policies were because of his “Conservative Agenda.”<span> </span>Well, Mr. Obama is not some middle of the road politician by any means.<span> </span>He is just as divisive as Bush has been labeled, just in the exact opposite on EVERY issue.<span> </span>Obama speaks about bringing our nation closer together from our division but his policies are nothing but more division.<span> </span>I’ve said before that some policies are never going to be bridged and in my opinion, Obama is on the wrong side of every moral or value issue.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Is our nation going to be brought together by Obama’s “bi-partisanship approach” or are we going to see even more separation because Obama is nothing more than the opposite of Bush?<span> </span>I suspect you know the answer.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Citation:  <a href="http://www.ontheissues.org">http://www.ontheissues.org/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.synapticdomination.com/2008/11/liberal-obama-agenda/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Liberal &amp; Conservative Marriage</title>
		<link>http://www.synapticdomination.com/2008/11/liberal-conservative-marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.synapticdomination.com/2008/11/liberal-conservative-marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 14:46:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Everyday Nonsense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Compromise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synapticdomination.com/?p=286</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After yesterday’s article on the makings of the Liberal Agenda, I had a short internal conversation with myself. The topic of this self involved conversation was, “Could I be happily married to a person who subscribed to the Liberal Agenda?” This actual topic was born from a short conversation I had with my wife just [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal">After yesterday’s article on the makings of the Liberal Agenda, I had a short internal conversation with myself.<span> </span>The topic of this self involved conversation was, “Could I be happily married to a person who subscribed to the Liberal Agenda?”<span> </span>This actual topic was born from a short conversation I had with my wife just a few days earlier.<span> </span>First, let me get something out in the open.<span> </span>We talk about everything no matter how stupid, important, or ignorant the topic may be.<span> </span>We have great communication so this wasn’t anything out of the ordinary for us to discuss together.<span> </span>I told her that I didn’t think I could be married to a Democrat.<span> </span>And by saying Democrat, she knew I meant a proud Liberal Agenda card holding member.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Could you make that statement to your spouse and have an intelligent conversation?<span> </span>Well, my wife is not a Liberal Agenda type of person.<span> </span>She believes in the same fundamental rights I believe our government protects and we also share the same beliefs in how distinguished moral and ethical behavior should be paramount in any person we elect.<span> </span>I would whole heartedly expect her to say the same thing… she could not marry a Liberal Agenda believing man.<span> </span>You may be saying that love in the truest form can overcome such a trivial affiliation.<span> </span>I beg to differ.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">The separation of a Democrat who has subscribed to the Liberal Agenda differs from the moderate Democrat and all forms and segments of the Republican Party.<span> </span>They have views that distort what truly matters most.<span> </span>These differences are not issues that can be compromised on for the most part.<span> </span>These differences are belief differences, not political process differences.<span> </span>Issues such as health care, immigration, taxation, and many other governmental talking points can all be debated and compromises can be reached that can satisfy all parties involved.<span> </span>However, there are certain aspects of the Liberal Agenda member that unequivocally separates them from the non Liberalized crowd.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Primarily, the issue of abortion is a core factor creating this vast difference.<span> </span>The Liberal Agenda Democrat will forever support abortion as a woman’s right.<span> </span>There is no compromise.<span> </span>The rest of us either believes in some kind of limitation of abortion to rape, incest, and potential mother death or completely ruled out unless the mother’s life is in peril.<span> </span>These two opposite sides of belief cannot be bridged with compromise.<span> </span>It’s an either/or situation.<span> </span>Can someone who believes a child’s life doesn’t carry any significance be married to someone who believes a child’s life should be regarded as one of the most pure and innocent blessings we have as human beings?</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Another divisive issue is of course gay marriage.<span> </span>Democratic Liberal Agenda policy followers believe that everyone should be allowed to marry and receive the all inclusive tax benefits from doing so.<span> </span>Everyone else resides anywhere from agreeing only to Civil Unions to not even supporting that.<span> </span>Can someone who truly believes homosexuals should be allowed to rewrite what the institution of marriage consists of be married to someone who believes that it is morally, ethically, and spiritually wrong do to so?</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Liberal Agenda followers believe in the basic fact that everyone should get to do anything they want as long as it doesn’t hurt anyone else.<span> </span>Get pregnant and don’t want to deal with nine months of pregnancy and a commitment to raising a child?<span> </span>Abort it.<span> </span>It’s your right, right? Are you gay and want to have the same benefits as a married couple?<span> </span>Change what marriage means so you can get the tax benefit.<span> </span>It’s your right, right?<span> </span>Want to smoke marijuana because it makes you feel good?<span> </span>Legalize drugs.<span> </span>It doesn’t hurt anyone but the drug user right?<span> </span>It’s your right to harm yourself if you wish, right?<span> </span>Want to remove all references to God and Christianity from education and our justice system because it may be offensive?<span> </span>Pass laws to remove it.<span> </span>It’s your right, right?</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">So, I stand by my comment.<span> </span>I could not and would not marry a Liberal Agenda Democrat.<span> </span>I don’t believe true love can exist in a situation with such disparate viewpoints.<span> </span>This is an either/or situation.<span> </span>I believe a standard Democrat and Republican can be happy together in marriage with a few bumps.<span> </span>But as we have seen, the middle of the road Democrat or Republican is a dying species.<span> </span>Our world has become divided by canyons of ideological differences that cannot be bridged by simple compromises.<span> </span>How we move forward will be a continuous struggle because at the root of our differences is actually our spiritual belief system.<span> </span>Religion has and always will be the major difference between us while we spend our time on this earth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.synapticdomination.com/2008/11/liberal-conservative-marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Liberal Agenda</title>
		<link>http://www.synapticdomination.com/2008/11/liberal-agenda/</link>
		<comments>http://www.synapticdomination.com/2008/11/liberal-agenda/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 19:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Political Beefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberal Agenda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wealth]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.synapticdomination.com/?p=285</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let’s talk a little bit about this so-called “Liberal Agenda” I’ve been writing about in my past articles. Some people only know the terms Liberal and Conservative and Democrat or Republican. Some do not know the different factions that exist within each Party. A Democrat does not necessarily have to subscribe to the Liberal Agenda [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal">Let’s talk a little bit about this so-called “Liberal Agenda” I’ve been writing about in my past articles.<span> </span>Some people only know the terms Liberal and Conservative and Democrat or Republican.<span> </span>Some do not know the different factions that exist within each Party.<span> </span>A Democrat does not necessarily have to subscribe to the Liberal Agenda and a Republican doesn’t have to adhere to the conservative right’s agenda to belong to the political Party.<span> </span>However these days with the middle of the road politician seemingly on the endangered species lists, you are more likely to find a very high percentage of liberal Democrats and conservative Republicans with very few in the middle.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">With that out of the way, what are the issues that determines which Democrat believes in Liberal Agenda policies?<span> </span>I’m not going to go into great detail on each one as I don’t want to enrage or put to sleep those who may be reading.<span> </span>The issues are in no order of importance and only appear as I randomly write them from my mind to digital paper.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Issue:<span> </span>Abortion</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">The Liberals would like you to believe that abortion has nothing to do with the child being grown in a mother’s body.<span> </span>They want you to focus upon the rights the mother has as it pertains to her body.<span> </span>While every human being has specific rights when it comes to their own body, a child changes the equation and the rights of that mother.<span> </span>Unborn babies have rights of their own and cannot be discounted.<span> </span>Abortion is the destruction of an unborn baby’s rights.<span> </span>Support abortion and support the minimizing of a child’s life.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Issue:<span> </span>Progressive Taxes</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Democrats subscribing to the Liberal Agenda believe that it is the “patriotic duty” of the “wealthy” to pay massive penalties in the form of taxes to cover the hardships of the less wealthy citizenship.<span> </span>Spread the wealth is a socialist/Marxist/Communist tenet and is a focal point of the Liberal Agenda.<span> </span>If you enjoy free markets and American capitalism, you will vehemently oppose this ideology.<span> </span>Wealthy people “spread the wealth” by donations and by providing jobs for the society, not by being forced to return their earned wealth to the government for “appropriate” redistribution.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Issue:<span> </span>Gun Control</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Many Liberals will try and make you believe that guns are at the root of all evil.<span> </span>An outright ban or severe limitation of who can own a weapon is another core item on the liberal’s agenda.<span> </span>Now, the liberals in power will of course be allowed to retain their gun ownerships, but the general citizen will not be allowed to exercise their constitutional right to own a weapon.<span> </span>Just to make a note, I don’t believe a citizen should own military grade, fully automatic weapons or explosives.<span> </span>Making a gun scary looking does not make it a military weapon.<span> </span>Semi-automatic guns are well within our rights as law abiding citizens.<span> </span>If a ban of the weapon itself cannot be achieved by the liberals, watch for ammunition bans…</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Issue:<span> </span>Homosexual Marriage</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Liberals wish to rewrite the general concept that marriage consists of one man and one woman entering into a lifelong commitment (a commitment which our Christian forefathers helped found this nation upon).<span> </span>They wish to include same-sex couples and redefine the institution of marriage.<span> </span>The reasoning for this primarily resides around the fact that same-sex couples are not afforded the same “rights” natural married couple enjoy.<span> </span>Tax credits from joint filing, child credits, and the list goes on.<span> </span>Civil unions are not enough… they want marriage redefined to include homosexual couples.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Issue:<span> </span>Government Control</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Every issue the Liberal Agenda entails basically comes from this all encompassing issue.<span> </span>Liberals believe that the government should have ultimate control of our society.<span> </span>The rights of the citizens are trivialized because the liberals believe they can satisfy the public by doing everything for them.<span> </span>They believe a country RUN by the government makes things “better” for everyone.<span> </span>I believe the government is here to protect our rights, not disseminate them to us.<span> </span>If we subscribe to the Liberal Agenda, we are headed for a Marxist regime in sheep’s clothing.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">There are many other issues involving affirmative action, government sponsored healthcare, foreign policy, and immigration just to name a few.<span> </span>But, I believe the above issues are more than enough to determine if you are of the mind to accept the Liberal Agenda or not.<span> </span>If you do not, it doesn’t make you a conservative or even a Republican.<span> </span>There are lots of Democrats who do not subscribe to the Liberal Agenda.<span> </span>However, more and more of the Democratic Party politicians are fully invested in the Liberal Agenda and these issues are their policy decision makers.<span> </span>Keep your eyes open to the true issues and remember you have rights not because the government gave them to you, but because you are an American citizen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.synapticdomination.com/2008/11/liberal-agenda/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
